company-name-logo

Eureka Forbes

Latest Judgments

Total 609 Consumer Court Cases Against Eureka Forbes.

Karnataka

M/s Eureka Forbes Limited V/S Ajit Prasad S.L S/o Late S.C.Lingaiah

Eureka Forbes  

Court Name: Mandya

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 112

|

Date of Filing: 09-09-2021

|

Date of Upload: 07-10-2022

Haryana

EUREKA FORBES LTD. V/S SHEELA AHUJA.

Eureka Forbes  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA. Execution Application No.:14 of 2022Date of Institution:16.05.2022Date of Decision:14.09.2022Sheela Ahuja Age 66 Yrs wife of Sh. Mohan Lal Ahuja, H.No. 1135, Sec-4, Panchkula. ……...DH/Complainan...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 16-05-2022

|

Date of Upload: 19-09-2022

Uttar Pradesh

EUREKA FORBES V/S SUDHANSHU KUMAR BHATTACHARYA

Eureka Forbes  

Court Name: Lucknow-II

Appelant Advocate TANU BANSAL

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 41

|

Date of Filing: 06-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 14-09-2022

Uttar Pradesh

EUREKA FORBES V/S ABDUL SALEEM

Eureka Forbes  

Court Name: Lucknow-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/295/2015( Date of Filing : 22 Sep 2015 )1. ABDUL SALEEM175/106GOLAGANJ LKO............Complainant(s)Versus1. EUREKA FORBES164/17-4 A NIKHILESH PALACE ASHOK MARG LKO.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Neelkuntha Sahya PRESIDENTHON'BLE...

Case Number: 295

|

Date of Filing: 22-09-2015

|

Date of Upload: 11-10-2022

Kerala

Eureka Forbes Limited, V/S Sunil Thomas,

Eureka Forbes  

Court Name: Kollam

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionCivil Station , Kollam-691013.Kerala.Complaint Case No. CC/202/2020( Date of Filing : 11 Sep 2020 )1. Sunil Thomas, Anazhicom House, Thrikkanamangal,Kottarakara.P.O,Kollam District,Pin-691506............Complainant(s)Versus1. Eureka Forbes Li...

Case Number: 202

|

Date of Filing: 11-09-2020

|

Date of Upload: 13-09-2022

Orissa

Eureka Forbes Limited V/S Sukanti Parida

Eureka Forbes  

Court Name: Cuttak

Appelant Advocate S K Senapati & associates

Respondant Advocate None

IN THE COURT OF THE DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,CUTTACK. C.C.No.106/2020 Sukanti Parida,W/O:Lokanath Parida,At:Matamath,Near Electric Substation,Ring Road,P.O:Buxibazar,P.S:Mangalabag,Cuttack,Odisha. ... Complainant. Vrs.Eureka Forbes Ltd.,Represented through ...

Case Number: 106

|

Date of Filing: 04-12-2020

|

Date of Upload: 03-09-2022

Karnataka

Eureka Forbes Ltd., V/S Sri.N.S. Jayasimha,

Eureka Forbes  

Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional

Appelant Advocate N.Nagarj and Associates

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 230

|

Date of Filing: 16-02-2021

|

Date of Upload: 23-08-2022

Tamil Nadu

The Managing Director, EUREKA FORBES your friend for life, V/S S.Esakkimuthu

Eureka Forbes  

Court Name: Virudhunagar

Appelant Advocate C.M.Maragatham

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 22-06-2022

|

Date of Upload: 26-08-2022

Madhya Pradesh

eureka forbes V/S N.P. singh

Eureka Forbes  

Court Name: Ujjain

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 05-03-2016

|

Date of Upload: 23-09-2022

Karnataka

EUREKA FORBES V/S Dr.Rajith M.L.

Eureka Forbes  

Court Name: Tumkur

Appelant Advocate Sri.Lingaiah

Respondant Advocate

TUMAKURU DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONIndian Red Cross Building ,1st Floor ,No.F-201, F-202, F-238 ,B.H.Road ,Tumakuru.Complaint Case No. CC/79/2022( Date of Filing : 11 Apr 2022 )1. Dr.Rajith M.L.A/a 37 years ,R/at Ullasa 6th Cross ,Jayanagara East ,Shettihalli...

Case Number: 79

|

Date of Filing: 11-04-2022

|

Date of Upload: 16-08-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Eureka Forbes in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Eureka Forbes ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Eureka Forbes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.