Electricity
Latest Judgments
Total 7485 Consumer Court Cases Against Electricity.
HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANR. V/S THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK KTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MANISH JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIAPPEAL NO. 21 OF 2005(Against the Order dated 17/03/2004 in Complaint No. 6/1997 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu) 1. THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK KTD.NURPUR DISTT. KANGRA H.P ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMACHA...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2005
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2010
HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANR. V/S THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK KTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MANISH JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIAPPEAL NO. 21 OF 2005(Against the Order dated 17/03/2004 in Complaint No. 6/1997 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu) 1. THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK KTD.NURPUR DISTT. KANGRA H.P ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMACHA...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2005
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2010
HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANR. V/S THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK KTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MANISH JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIAPPEAL NO. 21 OF 2005(Against the Order dated 17/03/2004 in Complaint No. 6/1997 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu) 1. THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK KTD.NURPUR DISTT. KANGRA H.P ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMACHA...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 25-01-2005
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2010
Punjab State Electricity Board, V/S Sukhdev singh
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Ranjit singh,Advocate
Respondant Advocate B.B.Khurana,Adv.
DCDRFFaridkotCONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 1 1. Sukhdev singhSukhdev Singh son of Amar singh,r/o Kaminana gate,Faridkot.FaridkotPUNJAB ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Punjab State Electricity Board,PSEB,The Mall,Faridkot.2. Assistant Executive Enginer(DS) city sub division,PSEBFaridkot. ....
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 01-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Hewlett-Packard India Sales Pvt. Ltd. V/S Southern Regional Power Committee Central Electricity Authority,
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate IP
Respondant Advocate Harsha & Co.,
IInd ADDL. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.1/7, Swathi Complex, 4th Floor, Seshadripuram, Bangalore-560 020consumer case(CC) No. CC/246/2010 Southern Regional Power Committee Central Electricity Authority, ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Hewlett-Packard I...
Case Number: 246
|
Date of Filing: 05-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Punjab state electricity Board V/S Jagroop singh
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Ranjit singh,Adv.
Respondant Advocate M.S.Brar,Adv.
DCDRFFaridkotCONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 5 1. Jagroop singhson of Lal singh,r/o v. Machhaki Kalan,Tehsil and district Faridkot. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Punjab state electricity Boardthe Mall,Patiala.2. Assistant Executive engineer(DS)Sub division,PSEB,Sadiq.Faridkot. ..............
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 08-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Bihar Sate Electricity through its Chairman, & Others, V/S Kalawati Devi,
Court Name: Patna
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 562
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2022
HARYANA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS. V/S HARI CHAND
Electricity Board Haryana Electricity
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KUNAL GARG
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1087 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 15/12/2009 in Appeal No. 1166/2002 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. HARI CHANDR/o. H. No. 1002, Sector 7-CFaridabadHaryana ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. HARYAN...
Case Number: 1087
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2010
MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD V/S ANIL KRISHNARAO PATIL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LAWYER'S KNIT & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2000 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 17/02/2010 in Appeal No. 2231/2004 of the State Commission Maharastra) 1. ANIL KRISHNARAO PATILAt Indira Bhadgaon Road, Tq. PachoraJalgaonMaharashtra ...........Peti...
Case Number: 2000
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 05-07-2010
The Asst. Engineer, Electrical Section, S.Battery Kerala state Electricity Board, S. Battery. V/S The Catholic Diocese Of S. Bathery Represented by its present Procurator Rev. Fr. Joseph , Kannankulam, Kuppady Village, S.Battery.
Court Name: Wayanad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, WayanadConsumer Disputes Redressal Forum, WayanadComplaint Case No. CC/09/21 1. The Catholic Diocese Of S. Bathery Represented by its present Procurator Rev. Fr. Joseph , Kannankulam, Kuppady Village, S.Battery. Kerala ...........Appellant(s)Ver...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 05-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Electricity in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Electricity ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Electricity under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.