Electricity
Latest Judgments
Total 7485 Consumer Court Cases Against Electricity.
M/s. Bihar State Electricity Board and Other, V/S Sri Sant Sharan Sharma,
Court Name: Patna
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 398
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2001
|
Date of Upload: 27-01-2022
The Bihar State Electricity Board, through its Chariman and Others, V/S Mrs. Dharmsheela Devi,
Court Name: Patna
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 218
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2022
PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANR. V/S DALI DEVI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 403 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 27/11/2009 in Appeal No. 1493/2009 of the State Commission Punjab) 1. DALI DEVIR/o. Prem Nagar, Kotkapura Tehsil and District FaridkotFaridkot - 151204 ...........Pet...
Case Number: 403
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 26-08-2010
WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD V/S RAFIKUL ISLAM
Electricity Board West Bengal Electricity
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate AVNEESH GARG
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1619 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 25/09/2006 in Appeal No. 345/2001 of the State Commission West Bengal) 1. RAFIKUL ISLAM- ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD- .........
Case Number: 1619
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2007
|
Date of Upload: 26-08-2010
PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANR. V/S M/S. JAI AMBEY RICE TRADING CO. & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HIMANSHU GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2012 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 28/01/2010 in Appeal No. 1121/2003 of the State Commission Punjab) 1. M/S. JAI AMBEY RICE TRADING CO. & ANR.Through its Partner Achhru Ram, s/o. Ramji Dass, Mannwala...
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 26-08-2010
Sr. Station Manager, West Bengal State Electricity V/S Utpal Biswas
Court Name: Nadia
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMNADIA170,DON BOSCO ROAD, AUSTIN MEMORIAL BUILDING.NADIA, KRISHNAGARComplaint Case No. CC/2009/101( Date of Filing : 21 Dec 2009 )1. Utpal BiswasS/o Late Santosh Kr. Biswas ,Vill. and P.O. Dignagar, P.S. Kotwali, Dist. Nadia ...........Com...
Case Number: 2009
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2018
Kerala State Electricity Board, Rep. by its Secretary, Vydhuthi Bhavan, Thiruvananthapuram. V/S MP Musthafa, Puthiyapurayil, Padinjarathara PO.
Court Name: Wayanad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, WayanadConsumer Disputes Redressal Forum, WayanadComplaint Case No. CC/10/81 1. MP Musthafa, Puthiyapurayil, Padinjarathara PO. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Kerala State Electricity Board, Rep. by its Secretary, Vydhuthi Bhavan, Thiruvananth...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Chandigarh Electricity Department V/S Avtar Singh
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Ratinder Singh Sodhi, Adv, (C)
Respondant Advocate Partime Arora, GP
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 1348 of 2009 1. Avtar SinghS/o Sh. Gian Singh, R/o # 337, Model Town, Ambala City, Haryana ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Chandigarh Electricity Depa...
Case Number: 1348
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
DWARIKA PRASAD V/S U.P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRADEEP MISRA
Respondant Advocate MR. SUDHIR KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 5000 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 22/04/2008 in Appeal No. 124/2001 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. U.P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDThrough its Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Divi...
Case Number: 5000
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 19-08-2010
NORTH GUJRAT ELECTRICITY CORPORATION LTD. V/S PATEL VIPULBHAI AMRITLAL
Court Name: Mahesana
Appelant Advocate T.J. DEVDA
Respondant Advocate D.G.SHUKAL
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2021
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Electricity in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Electricity ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Electricity under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.