company-name-logo

Electricity

Latest Judgments

Total 7487 Consumer Court Cases Against Electricity.

Maharashtra

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. LTD. through Sub-Divisional Engineear V/S Wireless Tata Tale Info Services LTD. (Now, Vyom Network LTD. Pune), Through Authority Shri. Anand Pramodrao Raut

Tata   Electricity  

Court Name: Chandrapur

Appelant Advocate Adv. A.U. Kullarwar

Respondant Advocate Adv.A.S.Khati

Arange sequence number in year 2009 confo-ch-mh@nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/11/45 1. Wireless Tata Tale Info Services LTD. (Now, Vyom Network LTD. Pune), Through Authority Shri. Anand Pramodrao RautAge-30yr., Occu.- Service, At.- Hudkeshwar, Nagpur, Tah.- NagpurNagpurMaharashtra ...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 21-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.LTD. Pobhurna through Ju. Engineear V/S Shrikrushna Sahkari Bhat Girni Marya. Dewada Khurd, Reg.No. 104 Tah. Pobhurna Through Manager Shri. Pundalik Kawduji Burande

Electricity  

Court Name: Chandrapur

Appelant Advocate Adv. Abhayu u. Kullarwar

Respondant Advocate Adv.A.S.Khati

Arange sequence number in year 2009 confo-ch-mh@nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/11/29 1. Shrikrushna Sahkari Bhat Girni Marya. Dewada Khurd, Reg.No. 104 Tah. Pobhurna Through Manager Shri. Pundalik Kawduji BurandeAge-52yr.,Occu.- service, At.Po.- Dewada khurd, Pobhurna.ChandrapurMaha...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

Assistant Executive Engineer,Kerala State Electricity Board,Sulthan Bathery Division,Sulthan Bathery V/S Ashraf,Ossur Manzi,Meenangadi P O,Purakkadi Village,Karyambadi.

Electricity  

Court Name: Wayanad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/10/2111. Ashraf,Ossur Manzi,Meenangadi P O,Purakkadi Village,Karyambadi............Complainant(s)Versus1. Assistant Executive Engineer,Kerala State Electricity Board,Sulthan Bathery Division,Sulthan Bathery.2. Kerala State Electricity Board,Thiruvananthapura...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 06-11-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd., Armori and 1 other V/S Vivek Balram Khewale, Aged 34 Yrs., Occu.-Business

Electricity  

Court Name: Gadchiroli

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/11/51. Vivek Balram Khewale, Aged 34 Yrs., Occu.-BusinessAt.Post Waddha, Tah. Armori.GadchiroliMaharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd., Armori and 1 otherAbove Bank of India, Armori, Tah. Armori.Gadchiro...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 28-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

MADHYA PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, V/S POONAMCHAND KESHARWANI

Electricity  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. R.K.SENGAR, ADV.

Respondant Advocate MS. PRAGATI NIKHARA SINGH, ADV.

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 881 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 28/11/2006 in Appeal No. 2108/2005 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. POONAMCHAND KESHARWANIS/O. KISHORILAL KESHARWANI, THROUGH LRS NEERAJ, R/O. JAISINGH NAGA...

Case Number: 881

|

Date of Filing: 16-03-2007

|

Date of Upload: 23-05-2011

Maharashtra

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd., Through it's Assistant Engineer, Armori. V/S Lalchand Jethamal Motwani, Aged 58 years, Occu.-Business

Electricity  

Court Name: Gadchiroli

Appelant Advocate Shri.Vijay Dhore

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/11/81. Lalchand Jethamal Motwani, Aged 58 years, Occu.-BusinessAt.Post Tah.Armori.GadchiroliMaharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd., Through it's Assistant Engineer, Armori.Above Bank of India, Armori, T...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 30-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

PRESIDENT, BHANDARA ZILLA ELECTRICITY BOARD EMPLOYEE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, R.N. 117 V/S SHRI RAMDAS GANPAT THAWKAR

Electricity Board   Electricity  

Court Name: Bhandara

Appelant Advocate SELF

Respondant Advocate MR.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTDISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BHANDARACONSUMER CASE NO. 11 of 39 1. SHRI RAMDAS GANPAT THAWKARR/o. KHAMB TALAO, OPP. DATTA MANDIR, TAH. DISTT. BHANDARABHANDARAMAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. PRESIDENT, BHANDARA ZILLA ELECTRICITY BOARD EMPLOYE...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 22-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Jharkhand

Abadh Bihari Ram V/S Jharkhand state Electricity Board

Electricity Board   Electricity  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s A.K. Pandey and Alka Sharma

Respondant Advocate Mr. Nitish Krishna

Case Number: 100

|

Date of Filing: 31-03-2009

|

Date of Upload: 04-11-2022

NCDRC

M/S. PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD V/S M/S. FARMERS POULTRY BREEDING FARM

Electricity Board   Electricity  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. KULDIP RAJ KAILA (AUTH. REP.)

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 114 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 29/11/2010 in Appeal No. 1566/2005 of the State Commission Punjab)1. M/S. FARMERS POULTRY BREEDING FARMVillage Koompur P.O. Khudda Tehsil DasuyaHoshiarpurHoshiarpur....

Case Number: 114

|

Date of Filing: 11-01-2011

|

Date of Upload: 19-05-2011

Maharashtra

Sub. Divisional Engineear, Mahrashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. LTD. V/S Shri. Madhowaji Raghobaji Ambilkar through Shri. Anil Madhowaji Ambilkar

Electricity  

Court Name: Chandrapur

Appelant Advocate Dr.Narendra Khobragade,Chandrapur

Respondant Advocate Adv.A.S.Khati

Arange sequence number in year 2009 confo-ch-mh@nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/11/25 1. Shri. Madhowaji Raghobaji Ambilkar through Shri. Anil Madhowaji AmbilkarAge- 36 yr., Occu.-Swayrojgar, At.- Nandgao(Pole), Tah.-BallarpurChandrapurMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Sub...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 17-02-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Electricity in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Electricity ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Electricity under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.