Court Name: Dhule
Appelant Advocate P N Joshi
Respondant Advocate Y.L.Jadhav
Complaint Case No. CC/10/2911. Mangalkumar Chandrakant Shinde Dhule...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Execuhve engineer Maharashtra Stat electricity Distribution Co L t d Varsha Bilding Anandnagar Deopur Dhule............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONABLE MR. D. D. Madake PRESIDENTHON'AB...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Palakkad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 174 Of 20111. Narayanankutty GupthanS/o Late Kunju Gupthan, Vadakkekkara House, Kattukulam amsom, Mangalamkunnu desom, Sreekrishnapuram-II village, Ottapalam Taluk, Pin- 679 513 PalakkadKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Kerala State Electricity BoardRepresented b...
Case Number: 174
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate P K Kukreja
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 493 of 2011 1. Baldev Raj SethiR/o # 3374, Sector 46/C, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. SDO, ElectricitySub Division No. 6, Sector 20/C, C...
Case Number: 493
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Electricity Board Electricity Uttar Pradesh
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NIKHIL JAIN
Respondant Advocate MR. ANURAG KISHORE
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2758 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 01/10/2007 in Appeal No. 87/1995 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LATE RADHA DEVI GUPTA (THROUGH LRs) GOKUL PRASAD GUPTA, R/O. H.NO. 1062, A.V. NAGAR UNNAO...
Case Number: 2758
|
Date of Filing: 13-08-2007
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2012
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Umesh S. Mangave
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/07/683(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/03/2007 in Case No. 95/2002 of District Kolhapur)1. Shri. Adinath Shantappa BirnaleR/o. Danoli, Tal. Shirol, Dist. KolhapurKolhapurMaharashtr...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate G. G. Joshi (Vandurkar)
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/05/1434(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/07/2005 in Case No. 499/2002 of District Kolhapur)1. Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Board,Rural Division No. 1, Tarabai P...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.Ashutosh Gole
Respondant Advocate --
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/03/972(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/05/2003 in Case No. A/00/267 of District Nashik)1. GANESH ICE FACTORY AND MILKMANMAD, DIST. NASHIK...........Appellant(s)Versus1. THE ASISTAN...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2003
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shri. Sandip S. Jinsiwale
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/07/469(Arisen out of Order Dated 22/03/2007 in Case No. 251/2006 of District Nashik)1. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.Through the Deputy Executive Engineer, ...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. A/58/2009(Arisen out of Order Dated 11/12/2008 in Case No. 288/2008 of District None)1. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. M. S. E. D. Co.Ltd. Sub-Divisio...
Case Number: 87
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S. P. Brahme
Respondant Advocate R. B. Narawade Patil
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. A/58/2009(Arisen out of Order Dated 11/12/2008 in Case No. 288/2008 of District None)1. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. M. S. E. D. Co.Ltd. Sub-Divisio...
Case Number: 58
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Electricity in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Electricity ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Electricity under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.