Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shri.S.N.Tandale.
Respondant Advocate Shri.Vivek Bhavthankar.
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. A/372/2007(Arisen out of Order Dated 17/03/2007 in Case No. 03/2005 of District Beed)1. Assistant Engineer,Maharashtra State Electricity Board.Power House Road,Tq.Majalgao...
Case Number: 372
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Electricity
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S JINSIWALE
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/12/37(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/07/2011 in Case No. 12/2011 of District Ratnagiri)1. MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITEDTHROUGH EXECUTIVE ENGINNEER, DI...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S. B. Deshpande & S. B. Joshi
Respondant Advocate Adv.S.P.Brahme
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.CC NO. 16 Of 20101. M/s. Bhavanidas GinningPressing Through its Proprietor Kedar S/o. Bhavanidas Kulkarni R/o. Ambad Ta. Ambad Dist. Jalna ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Mahatashtra Sta...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 20-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. V.K. PALIWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2810 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 21/03/2012 in Appeal No. 373/2011 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. M/S. BASANT AGRO TECH (INDIA) LTD.Through its Constituted Attorney Shri Rajendra Sukhdeo Tay...
Case Number: 2810
|
Date of Filing: 30-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-12-2012
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. A. K. Pandey
Respondant Advocate Mrs. Rashmi Kumar
Case Number: 183
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2022
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Electricity
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sau.S.S.Medhekar.
Respondant Advocate Shri.V.D.Patil.
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. A/900/2007 (Arisen out of Order Dated 19/06/2007 in Case No. 23/2007 of District Ahmednagar)1. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. Through it`s Executi...
Case Number: 900
|
Date of Filing: 02-08-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Electricity
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV. KOTWAL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/08/198(Arisen out of Order Dated 01/10/2007 in Case No. CC/07/233 of District None)1. MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICI...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 29-02-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.N. Tandale
Respondant Advocate D.M.Mane
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. A/107/2007(Arisen out of Order Dated 08/12/2006 in Case No. 24/2005 of District Beed)1. Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd. Maharashtra ...
Case Number: 107
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shri.S.N.Tandale.
Respondant Advocate Shri.S.S.Vidhvuns.
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. A/126/2008 (Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District None)1. Assistant Engineer,Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd.Beed.Beed.2. Executive Engi...
Case Number: 126
|
Date of Filing: 05-02-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 494
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 28-05-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Electricity in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Electricity ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Electricity under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.