company-name-logo

Electricity

Latest Judgments

Total 7487 Consumer Court Cases Against Electricity.

NCDRC

PUNJAB POWER CORPORATION (ERSTWHILE PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD) V/S ATUL PURI

Electricity  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1810 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 15/11/2011 in Appeal No. 492/2006 of the State Commission Punjab)1. ATUL PURIS/o Shri Kartar Chand, R/o M-21 Green Avenue AmritsarPunjab...........Petitioner(s)Vers...

Case Number: 1810

|

Date of Filing: 03-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-04-2013

Circuit Bench Aurangabad

Ramrao Bappaji Kakde, V/S Assistant Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.

Electricity  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S. N. Tandale

Respondant Advocate D. V. Solanki

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. A/07/699(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/04/2007 in Case No. 92/2006 of District Beed)1. Assistant Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. Sub- Division...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 09-07-2007

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

SWARAN SINGH V/S SDO PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

Electricity Board   Electricity  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate VIVEK K GOYAL

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 149 OF 2013 IN RP/1158/20081. SDO PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD ...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SWARAN SINGH ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING ME...

Case Number: 149

|

Date of Filing: 11-03-2013

|

Date of Upload: 15-05-2013

Circuit Bench Aurangabad

Md.Naseer Mohd.Yunus. V/S Deputy Executive Engineer,Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution company Ltd.

Electricity  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sau.S.S.Medhekar.

Respondant Advocate Sau.Kiran Ostwal.

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. A/612/2008(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District None)1. Deputy Executive Engineer,Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution company Ltd.Shahgunj Sub Div...

Case Number: 612

|

Date of Filing: 28-01-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

SDO, Electricity V/S Amar Singh Sandhu

Electricity  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 76 of 2013 1. Amar Singh Sandhu ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 20 Mar 2013 ORDER BEFORE THE DISTRICT C...

Case Number: 76

|

Date of Filing: 18-02-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Circuit Bench Nagpur

Vijay S/o Wamanrao Zade. V/S Maharashtra State Electricity Board through its Exectutive Engineer, wardha.

Electricity Board   Electricity  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Adv.

Respondant Advocate Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/01/1736(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/10/2001 in Case No. CC/69/2001 of District Wardha)1. Maharashtra State Elect...

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 08-11-2001

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Circuit Bench Aurangabad

Sau.Nayankaur Amaloksingh Ramgdiya. V/S Executive Engineer,Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution company Ltd.

Electricity  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Shri.Vijay Patil.

Respondant Advocate Shri.G.R.Sayyad

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. A/08/86(Arisen out of Order Dated 14/12/2007 in Case No. 35/2007 of District None)1. Executive Engineer,Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution company Ltd.Tq.and Dist....

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 28-01-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Circuit Bench Aurangabad

Rudrani Construction Co. Through it's Authority Holder & Manager V/S The Deputy Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd.

Construction   Electricity  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate A.S.Shelke

Respondant Advocate Amit Yadkikar

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. FA/218/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/03/2012 in Case No. 325/2009 of District Latur )1. The Deputy Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Lt...

Case Number: 218

|

Date of Filing: 28-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Circuit Bench Aurangabad

The Executive Engineer Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd,Rural Division. V/S Chandrakant kisanrao Dahale.

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company   Electricity  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Bhushan Kulkarni

Respondant Advocate Smt.S.S.Medhekar.

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. A/923/2008(Arisen out of Order Dated 25/07/2008 in Case No. 510/2007 of District Aurangabad)1. Chandrakant kisanrao Dahale.R/o.Khadkeshwar,Aurangabad............Appellant(...

Case Number: 923

|

Date of Filing: 28-08-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

CHAIRMAN, BIHAR STAE ELECTRICITY BOARD. & ORS. V/S M/S. MAYUR MEDICALS

Electricity  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.

Respondant Advocate MR. MOHIT KUMAR SHAH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1167 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 07/01/2011 in Appeal No. 508/2007 of the State Commission Bihar)1. M/S. MAYUR MEDICALSR/o. Mohalla Bhikhanpur, Firoz Palace, P.S. KotwaliBhagalpurBihar...........Pe...

Case Number: 1167

|

Date of Filing: 11-04-2011

|

Date of Upload: 28-03-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Electricity in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Electricity ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Electricity under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.