Electricity
Latest Judgments
Total 7487 Consumer Court Cases Against Electricity.
Deputy Engineer,Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd. V/S Shri.Ravindra Basvanappa Mulge.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shri.P.M.Kulkarni.
Respondant Advocate
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.FA No: 323 Of 2011(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/05/2010 in Case No. 226/2010 of District None)1. Shri.Ravindra Basvanappa Mulge.R/o.Tq.Omerga,Dist.Osmanabad............Appellant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 323
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANR. V/S AVTAR SINGH HOTI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. SEEMA KUMARI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 679 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 29/09/2011 in Appeal No. 339/2007 of the State Commission Punjab)1. AVTAR SINGH HOTIS/o Sh Bir Singh, R/o H.No-146/19 Mohalla SecretaryGurdaspurPunjab...........Peti...
Case Number: 679
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2013
SDO ELECTRICITY V/S HARMINDER KAUR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GURMUKH SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4377 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 30/10/2009 in Appeal No. 17/2009 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. HARMINDER KAURHouse No. 255, Sector-35A, Chandigarh...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. SDO ELECT...
Case Number: 4377
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 05-07-2013
ASSISTANT ENGINEER, MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD V/S SATYANARAYAN SHRIKRISHNA KALANTRI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ATUL BABASAHEB DAKH
Respondant Advocate MR. AJIT S. BHASME
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3376 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 22/07/2011 in Appeal No. 2589/2006 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. SATYANARAYAN SHRIKRISHNA KALANTRISub Division beed, Tal,BeedMaharastra...........Petitioner...
Case Number: 3376
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 08-07-2013
PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD V/S RAJESH KUMAR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3261 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 01/06/2010 in Appeal No. 1512/2004 of the State Commission Punjab)1. RAJESH KUMARResident of Malout Road, Abohar, Tehsil AboharFerozepurPunjab...........Petitioner(...
Case Number: 3261
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2013
S.D.O. ELECTRICITY V/S HARMINDER KAUR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MR. JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1439 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 30/03/2011 in Appeal No. 395/2010 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. HARMINDER KAURR/o. Hosue No. 255, Sector 5-AChandigarh...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. S.D.O...
Case Number: 1439
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2013
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd. (O.M.) V/S Dyandeo Kisanrao Magar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A. M. Mamidwar
Respondant Advocate
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. A/444/2009(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/04/2009 in Case No. 702/2008 of District Aurangabad)1. Dyandeo Kisanrao Magar R/o. Paithan Tq. Paithan Dist. Aurangabad ..............
Case Number: 444
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Shri.Chandrakant Baburao Gaware. V/S Assistant Engineer,Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Smt.S.S.Medhekar.
Respondant Advocate Shri.N.R.Bhavar.
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. FA/07/491(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/04/2007 in Case No. 475/2006 of District None)1. Assistant Engineer,Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.Ltd. Sub Division,...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 14-06-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 409
|
Date of Filing: 01-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2016
Case Number: 1768
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Electricity in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Electricity ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Electricity under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.