Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Ranjit singh,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Rajneesh Garg,Adv.
DCDRFFaridkotCONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 3 1. Rajinder Singhson of Jagroop singh r/o village Jhakhar wala,tehsil jaito,Faridkot. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Punjab state Electricity BoardThe mall,Patiala.2. Assistant Executive Engineer(DS) subdivision, PSEB,Bajakhana. ...........Res...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VINEET BHAGAT
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIFIRST APPEAL NO. 227 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 09/04/2010 in Complaint No. 11/2008 of the State Commission Punjab) 1. PUNJAB STATE COOP. SUPPLY & MARKETING FEDERATING LTD. 'MARKFRD HOUSE'4,Sector 35-13, Chandigarh`Chan...
Case Number: 227
|
Date of Filing: 23-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 23-08-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. M.T. GEORGE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2058 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 06/02/2010 in Appeal No. 736/2005 of the State Commission Kerala) 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANR.Vaidhuthi Bhavan, PattomTrivandrumKerala2. THE EXECUTIVE EN...
Case Number: 2058
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2010
Electricity Board Gujarat Electricity Board Electricity
Court Name: Mahesana
Appelant Advocate L.S. RAJPUT
Respondant Advocate D.G. SHUKAL
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 01-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 26-01-2021
Court Name: Moga
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
distt.consumer mogadistrict consumer forum,mogaCONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 48 1. Mangat RaiS/o RamGopal Village Dharmkot Moga ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. S.D.O Punjab State Electricity BoardPSEB Dharmkot ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 06 J...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 3813 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 04/06/2009 in Appeal No. 82/2009 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh) 1. YAMINI BAI W/0 Vasu Dewangan, Through: Special Power of Attorney Holder Diwakar Singh Thaku...
Case Number: 3813
|
Date of Filing: 30-06-2009
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2010
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Ranjit singh,Adv.
Respondant Advocate B.B.Khurana,Adv.
DCDRFFaridkotCONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 7 1. Sohan singh son of Tota singh r/o German colony,old cantt road,Faridkot. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Punjab state electricity BoardThe Mall,Patiala.2. Assistant Executive engineer(DS) City sub division,PSEB,Faridkot. ...........Responden...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MANISH JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIAPPEAL NO. 21 OF 2005(Against the Order dated 17/03/2004 in Complaint No. 6/1997 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu) 1. THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK KTD.NURPUR DISTT. KANGRA H.P ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMACHA...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 25-01-2005
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MANISH JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIAPPEAL NO. 21 OF 2005(Against the Order dated 17/03/2004 in Complaint No. 6/1997 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu) 1. THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK KTD.NURPUR DISTT. KANGRA H.P ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMACHA...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2005
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MANISH JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIAPPEAL NO. 21 OF 2005(Against the Order dated 17/03/2004 in Complaint No. 6/1997 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu) 1. THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK KTD.NURPUR DISTT. KANGRA H.P ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. HIMACHA...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2005
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2010
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Electricity Board in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Electricity Board ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Electricity Board under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.