Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AJAY SAHAI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4067 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 12/09/2008 in Appeal No. 2879/2001 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. ASHA MAHAROTRAR/o 710 Shiv Ratan Estate 6/25,Parwati Bagla Rd.KanpurUttar Pradesh..........
Case Number: 4067
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2008
|
Date of Upload: 06-08-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AJAY SAHAI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4067 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 12/09/2008 in Appeal No. 2879/2001 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. ASHA MAHAROTRAR/o 710 Shiv Ratan Estate 6/25,Parwati Bagla Rd.KanpurUttar Pradesh..........
Case Number: 4083
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2008
|
Date of Upload: 06-08-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJIV BAHL & AJIT KUMAR
Respondant Advocate M/S. H.K. J & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 827 OF 2013 IN CC/180/20101. RAJIV MARWAH & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. ELDECO INFRASTRUCTURE & PROPERTIES LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARIHOKE,...
Case Number: 827
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-05-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JOYDEEP SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MS. SNEH LATA SHRIVASTAVA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 509 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/07/2012 in Complaint No. 102/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ELDECO MANSIONZ RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATIONHaving its Registered Office at- Club Building, ELDECO ...
Case Number: 509
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. RAJESH KUMAR & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate HKJ & ASSOCIATEDS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 95 OF 2013 IN CC/164/20121. BINAY KUMAR BHUWANIA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. ELDECO INFRASTRUCTURE & PROPERTY LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARIHO...
Case Number: 95
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. RAJESH KUMAR & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate HKJ & ASSOCIATEDS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 96 OF 2013 IN CC/164/20121. BINAY KUMAR BHUWANIA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. ELDECO INFRASTRUCTURE & PROPERTY LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARIHO...
Case Number: 96
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ASEEM MEHROTRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 200 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/01/2012 in Complaint No. 2/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. VIJAY KUMARS/o Late Sh. Sohan Lal Ghai, R/o B-25/539/A/10, Jalandhar bye pass Road, Karabaru Ludhian...
Case Number: 200
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 05-06-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ASHOK KUMAR PANIGARAHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3218 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 27/01/2010 in Appeal No. 1033/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SMT. AKSHMA KUMARHouse No. 289/169, Moti Nagar, Thana NakaLucknowUttar Pradesh.............
Case Number: 3218
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 01-11-2010
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sri S K Gupta
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1998/1132( Date of Filing : 04 Oct 1998 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Eldeco Housing A...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Sm...
Case Number: 1998
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-1998
|
Date of Upload: 30-08-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arvind Razdan
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. C/1997/52( Date of Filing : 09 Jun 1997 )1. Smt. Renu Saxena a...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Eldeco Housinga............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON...
Case Number: 1997
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-1997
|
Date of Upload: 22-07-2022
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Eldeco in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Eldeco ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Eldeco under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.