Educational Institutions
Latest Judgments
Total 25 Consumer Court Cases Against Educational Institutions.
M/S. SRI CHAITANYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS V/S MOLLETI APPALASWAMY NAIDU
Court Name: Visakhapatnam
Appelant Advocate SYED MOINUDDIN
Respondant Advocate U.S.V.PRASAD
Case Number: 63
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 02-02-2019
A. Chandrasekhar V/S Sri Chaitanya Educational Institutions
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M. Hari Babu
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaFirst Appeal No. A/97/2018( Date of Filing : 23 Feb 2018 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 25/01/2018 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/30/2014 of District Mahbubnagar)1. Sri Chaitanya Educational InstitutionsRep by its Competent Authorit...
Case Number: 97
|
Date of Filing: 23-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2019
The Principal St. Paul's Educational Institutions V/S SRI UTPAL ROY
Court Name: Howrah
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah 711 101.Office (033) 2638 0892, Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892Execution Application No. EA/14/134InComplaint Case No. CC/14/1951. SRI UTPAL ROY32/1/5, Kali Banerjee Lane, 2. Howrah District...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 23-08-2017
Sri Utpal Roy V/S The Principal, St. Pauls Educational Institutions
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Prasanta Banerjee
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. A/120/2015(Arisen out of Order Dated 22/08/2014 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/195/2014 of District Howrah)1. The Principal, St. Pauls Educational Institutions106,...
Case Number: 120
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-07-2017
KUM AKSHATHA V/S SECRETERY, B.N.M. EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. S.V. JOGA RAO, MRS. S. RADHA PYARI & MR. BHARAT SWAROOP SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. ANAND MISHRA, MR. HEMANT KUMAR & MR. UTKARSH TRIPATHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 655 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 09/03/2016 in Complaint No. 77/2009 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. SECRETERY, B.N.M. EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS & ANR.27TH CROSS. 12-17TH MAIN, BANASHANKRI 2ND STAGE,...
Case Number: 655
|
Date of Filing: 02-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-09-2016
KARNATAKA RESIDENTAIL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY V/S R.B.LAKSHMINARAYANA SINGH
Society Educational Institutions
Court Name: Bellary
Appelant Advocate M.NETAJI MOHAN
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 204
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-06-2016
Sri Chaitanya Educational Institutions V/S Kodepaka Padma
Court Name: Krishna at Vijaywada
Appelant Advocate T.Sanjaya Varma
Respondant Advocate K.Benarjee
Case Number: 236
|
Date of Filing: 24-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2015
Narayana Group of Educational Institutions V/S Jagani Ramesh
Court Name: Visakhapatnam-II
Appelant Advocate Palakurthi Srinivasa Apparao
Respondant Advocate M/s Badarinath & Madanmohan
Case Number: 184
|
Date of Filing: 12-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-10-2015
Dr.P.Narayana, Founder and Chairman Of Narayana Group Educational Institutions V/S Palle Sriharinath, S/o Laxmaiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ:Advocate,
Court Name: Hyderabad-II
Appelant Advocate M/s. Rama Krishna
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 495
|
Date of Filing: 24-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 02-07-2015
SRI CHAITANYA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS REP.BY THE DIRECTOR & OTHERS V/S CH.V.SATYANARAYANA RAJU
Court Name: Vizianagaram
Appelant Advocate P.HARAGOPAL
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM- VIZIANAGARAM(UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986)Complaint Case No. CC/74/20141. CH.V.SATYANARAYANA RAJUS/O LATE RAMARAJU, AGED 32 YEARS,FORT ROAD, VZMVIZIANAGARAM...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SRI CHAITANYA EDUCATIONA...
Case Number: 74
|
Date of Filing: 15-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Educational Institutions in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Educational Institutions ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Educational Institutions under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.