Education
Latest Judgments
Total 2441 Consumer Court Cases Against Education.
The Controller Of Examination, Pride, Distance Education V/S RAJESWARI
Court Name: Thoothukkudi
Appelant Advocate TR.RUBAN KISHORE
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 46
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2019
SANSKAR COLLEGE OF EDUCATION V/S MANDER MEENA
Court Name: Alwar
Appelant Advocate BHOP SINGH
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1169
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2018
DEXL EDUCATION SERVICES INDIA PVT V/S MADUR GOPTA
Court Name: Alwar
Appelant Advocate PANKIG GUPATA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 729
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 01-11-2018
Deputy Exedcutive Engineer,M S E D C L V/S Mukund Education Society through secretary Vaishali Walchale
Court Name: Washim
Appelant Advocate S B Agrawal
Respondant Advocate C S Poddar
Case Number: 71
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2018
H.C.L Learning Ltd., Noida, U.P V/S Model Education Society, Uppalli, Chikmagalur
Court Name: Chikmagalur
Appelant Advocate G.R Mallikarjuna
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 85
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-11-2018
New India Assurance Company Branch Malkapur Through Branch Maneger V/S Matoshri Education Society No F 4513 Through Sacretaty Bhushan Madan Minase
Education New India Assurance Society
Court Name: Buldana
Appelant Advocate Ad A M saoji
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 65
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2019
VIJAYA BANK & 2 ORS. V/S THE SOUTH INDIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. RAMNI TANEJA, MS. NANDINI MENON & MR. GAURAV SINHA
Respondant Advocate Shri Vaibhav Dang,
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 491 OF 2014 1. THE SOUTH INDIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY(NOW KNOWN AS THE MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC TRUSTS), Through V. Shankar, Its President and Authorized Signatory, Having Its SIES Chowk, K.A. Subhramaniam Road, Mat...
Case Number: 494
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-10-2018
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & 2 ORS. V/S THE SOUTH INDIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY
Bank Of India Central Bank Of India Central Bank Of India Education Society
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. RAMNI TANEJA, MS. NANDINI MENON & MR. GAURAV SINHA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 491 OF 2014 1. THE SOUTH INDIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY(NOW KNOWN AS THE MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC TRUSTS), Through V. Shankar, Its President and Authorized Signatory, Having Its SIES Chowk, K.A. Subhramaniam Road, Mat...
Case Number: 493
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-10-2018
BANK OF INDIA & 2 ORS. V/S THE SOUTH INDIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY
Bank Of India Bank Of India Education Society
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. RAMNI TANEJA, MS. NANDINI MENON & MR. GAURAV SINHA
Respondant Advocate M/S. M.V. KINI & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 491 OF 2014 1. THE SOUTH INDIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY(NOW KNOWN AS THE MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC TRUSTS), Through V. Shankar, Its President and Authorized Signatory, Having Its SIES Chowk, K.A. Subhramaniam Road, Mat...
Case Number: 491
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-10-2018
UCO BANK & 2 ORS. V/S THE SOUTH INDIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY
Uco Bank Uco Bank Education Society
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. RAMNI TANEJA, MS. NANDINI MENON & MR. GAURAV SINHA
Respondant Advocate MR. ASHWARYA SINHA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 491 OF 2014 1. THE SOUTH INDIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY(NOW KNOWN AS THE MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC TRUSTS), Through V. Shankar, Its President and Authorized Signatory, Having Its SIES Chowk, K.A. Subhramaniam Road, Mat...
Case Number: 495
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-10-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Education in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Education ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Education under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.