company-name-logo

Education

Latest Judgments

Total 2441 Consumer Court Cases Against Education.

Gujarat

I.C.I.C.I. BANK LTD. V/S CONSUMMER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH SOCIETY+MR.K.K.BAJAJ

Education  

Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural

Appelant Advocate JOHN PINTO

Respondant Advocate L.M.PATEL

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 25-02-2010

|

Date of Upload: 11-02-2021

Gujarat

THE PRINCIPAL,DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL V/S CONSUMMER EDUCATION AND RESEARCH SOCIETY SURAKCHA SANKOOL

Education   School   Society  

Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural

Appelant Advocate JOHN PINTO

Respondant Advocate NILAY S. DAVE

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 22-03-2010

|

Date of Upload: 11-02-2021

Gujarat

THE PRESIDENT OF CHAMPABEN BHAGAT EDUCATION TRUST V/S HARJIVANBHAI RANSHODBHAI PALEJIYA

Education  

Court Name: Ahmedabad City

Appelant Advocate SELF

Respondant Advocate M K DUDHIA/ HETA SHAH

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 07-01-2008

|

Date of Upload: 01-10-2020

Gujarat

ICICI BANK LTD.+RIGIONAL TRASPOST OFFICE V/S CONSUMMER EDUCATION RESEARCH AND SOCAITY+DEEPA KIRITBHAI SHAH

ICICI Bank   Education  

Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural

Appelant Advocate DHARMESH C. MEHTA

Respondant Advocate L.M.PATEL

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 01-01-2010

|

Date of Upload: 01-03-2021

Gujarat

PERAMOUNT HEALTHCARE MGMT.(P) LTD. V/S CONSUMMER EDUCATION AND RESERARCH SOCIETY

Education   Society  

Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural

Appelant Advocate JOHN PINTO

Respondant Advocate AVNIBEN MEHTA

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 04-06-2007

|

Date of Upload: 11-02-2021

NCDRC

SMT. BIMLA DEVI V/S POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, CHANDIGARH THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR

Institute   Education  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate SONSHI NARULA DALAL & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 788 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 31/01/2008 in Appeal No. 696/2007 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, CHANDIGARH THROUGH ITS DIRECTORTHROUGH ITS DIR...

Case Number: 788

|

Date of Filing: 18-02-2008

|

Date of Upload: 27-08-2010

Gujarat

HIGH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GANDHINAGAR V/S DANGAR VALBAIBEN PUNABHAI

Education  

Court Name: Junagadh

Appelant Advocate V H BORIYA

Respondant Advocate M B KHANIYA

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 23-12-2008

|

Date of Upload: 06-12-2019

Gujarat

SHREE COMMISSIONER HIGH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT V/S HAIRS OF DEACISE DANGAR DEVIBEN PUNABHAI DANGAR VALBAIBEN PUNABHAI

Education  

Court Name: Junagadh

Appelant Advocate V H BORIYA

Respondant Advocate M B KHANIYA

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 23-12-2008

|

Date of Upload: 17-08-2020

Kerala

THE DIRECTOR,DEPUTY DIRECTORATE OF DISTANCE EDUCATION ,ANNA UNIVERSITY V/S MIDHUN KUMAR ATHADI

University   Education  

Court Name: Kozhikode

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

KOZHIKODECONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCC NO. 279 Of 2010 1. MIDHUN KUMAR ATHADIMANAGING PARTNER,DIGITAL INNOVATIONS ,ATHADI BUILDINGS,MANKAVU PO,KALOOR ROADKOZHIKODE ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. THE DIRECTOR,DEPUTY DIRECTORATE OF DISTANCE EDUCATION ,ANNA UNIVERSITYVEERAPA...

Case Number: 279

|

Date of Filing: 21-07-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

PANDIT RUPLA PATIL V/S TECHNICAL AND MEDICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY FAIZPUR

Medical   Education   Society  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. SUDHA GUPTA

Respondant Advocate MR. SAMEER DEWAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 193 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 30/11/2005 in Appeal No. 574/2005 of the State Commission Maharastra) 1. TECHNICAL AND MEDICAL EDUCATION SOCIETY FAIZPURTAL YAWAL DISTT. JALGAON - - ...........Petiti...

Case Number: 193

|

Date of Filing: 20-01-2006

|

Date of Upload: 13-08-2010

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Education in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Education ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Education under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.