company-name-logo

Education

Latest Judgments

Total 2441 Consumer Court Cases Against Education.

NCDRC

BOARD OF SCHOOL EDUCATION HARYANA AND ORS V/S ANUKUSH DEVI

Education   School   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VIKRAM SINGH, ADV.

Respondant Advocate MS. MADHUMITA BORA, ADV.

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2281 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 01/03/2007 in Appeal No. 1090/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. ANUKUSH DEVID/O SH ROOP CHAND, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE FAIZALPUR, TEHSIL INDRIDISTT. KARNALHARYANA...

Case Number: 2281

|

Date of Filing: 03-07-2007

|

Date of Upload: 19-07-2011

Gujarat

Education mandal V/S Dipalben Kalpeshkumar

Education  

Court Name: Amreli

Appelant Advocate V.P.Popat

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 08-02-2011

|

Date of Upload: 21-04-2015

Maharashtra

Principal Clinical Research Education & Management Academy V/S Chetan Dinkar Joshi

Education  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT.Admn. Bldg., 3rd Floor, Near Chetana College, Govt. Colony, Bandra(East), Mumbai-400 051.Complaint Case No. CC/09/69 1. Chetan Dinkar JoshiA-11, Nav Surya Prabha, Murar Road,Mulund-West, Mumbai-80Maharastra ...........Ap...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 22-01-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research V/S Jug Jeevan Pal

Medical   Institute   Education  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 1101 of 2009 1. Jug Jeevan PalR/o # 4810/3, Chowk Ghandan, Near Pipli Bazar, Ambala City, HR. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For t...

Case Number: 1101

|

Date of Filing: 04-08-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

P.T. EDUCATION COCHING V/S FATAHA SINGH

Education  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 642

|

Date of Filing: 23-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 23-04-2016

Kerala

M/S OPTECH IT EDUCATION V/S PRANISHA T M

Education  

Court Name: Kozhikode

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/09/1331. PRANISHA T MMANGATT,KEEZHAL PO,VILLIYAPPALLY PANCHAYAT,KOZHIKODE673104KOZHIKODEKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S OPTECH IT EDUCATIONEDODI,VATAKARA,KOZHIKODEKOZHIKODEKerala2. DESIYA VANITHA THOZHIL VIKASANA CORPORATIONNEAR SREE RAMA GOVT.PO...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 24-03-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 21-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 27-08-2020

Maharashtra

IITIAN'S PACE EDUCATION PVT. LTD, V/S DR PRASHANT SHASHIKANT SAWANT

Education  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/11/1731. DR PRASHANT SHASHIKANT SAWANT602-A & B, B-WING, BLDG NO. 29, TILAK NAGAR, BHARAT C.H.S. LTD, TILAK NAGAR, CHEMBUR, M...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 05-04-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

The Director Primary Education Department (AC) Punjab V/S Parkash Kaur

Education  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 742 of 2010 1. Parkash Kauraged 72 Yrs wife of Sh. Harbhajan Singh R/o House No. 217 Block-4 Mohali Employees Co-Operative Group Bldg. Society Secto...

Case Number: 742

|

Date of Filing: 06-12-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Uttar Pradesh

District Basic Education Officer V/S Girija Shankar Awasthi

Education  

Court Name: Unnao

Appelant Advocate Shiv Prakash Bajpai Ad.

Respondant Advocate S.N Madhukar Ad.

Case Number: 36

|

Date of Filing: 01-02-2008

|

Date of Upload: 26-07-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Education in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Education ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Education under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.