company-name-logo

Education

Latest Judgments

Total 2441 Consumer Court Cases Against Education.

Chandigarh

The Director, Post Graduate Institution of Medical Research and Education (P.G.I), V/S Lallan Bhartiya Nishad

Medical   Education  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Sh. Satyavir Singh, Authorized representative

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 589 of 2012 1. Lallan Bhartiya Nishad#17 C, Village -Abheypur, District -Panchkula ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. The Director, Post Graduate Institu...

Case Number: 589

|

Date of Filing: 07-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

DISTT. EDUCATION OFFICER V/S NATTHU RAM

Education  

Court Name: Sagar

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 102

|

Date of Filing: 12-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 11-02-2016

Madhya Pradesh

M/S SANT. LORANCE EDUCATION SOCIETY V/S KU. DIVYA KUDNANI

Education   Society  

Court Name: Jabalpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 29-07-2010

|

Date of Upload: 25-02-2016

Madhya Pradesh

Danish Grah Nirman Sahkari Samiti Mydt. V/S Namrata Education Society

Education   Society  

Court Name: Bhopal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 31-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 08-03-2016

NCDRC

DIRECTOR OF DISTANCE EDUCATION GURU JAMBHESHWAR UNIVERSITY & ANR. V/S DEEPAK SONI

University   Education  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 669 OF 2012 IN RP/3918/20111. DEEPAK SONI...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DIRECTOR OF DISTANCE EDUCATION GURU JAMBHESHWAR UNIVERSITY & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUST...

Case Number: 669

|

Date of Filing: 19-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 02-01-2013

Madhya Pradesh

PRINCIPAL PREMWATI COLLAGE OF EDUCATION BeD COLLEGE V/S KUMARI PRATIBHA PATEL

Education  

Court Name: Rewa

Appelant Advocate DHIRENDRA PRATAP SINGH

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 267

|

Date of Filing: 25-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 27-05-2017

Madhya Pradesh

BLOCK EDUCATION OFFISAR REWA M.P. V/S SMT.PUJA SUKHLA

Education  

Court Name: Rewa

Appelant Advocate S.N.SUHKLA

Respondant Advocate ARUAN GOTAM

Case Number: 419

|

Date of Filing: 08-01-2010

|

Date of Upload: 05-05-2017

Maharashtra

PUNEET SUBHASH BAGADIA V/S SUMAN EDUCATION SOCIETY

Education   Society  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate CHANDRAKANT KOBNAK

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIRevision Petition No. RP/12/79(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/09/2012 in Case No. 421/2011 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. SUMAN EDUCATION SOCIETYL N COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY SUMAN EDUCATI...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 11-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

RANJIT FULCHAND SHARMA V/S SUMAN EDUCATION SOCIETY

Education   Society  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate CHANDRAKANT KOBNAK

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIRevision Petition No. RP/12/79(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/09/2012 in Case No. 421/2011 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. SUMAN EDUCATION SOCIETYL N COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY SUMAN EDUCATI...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 11-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

MOHD IRSHAD ANSARI V/S SUMAN EDUCATION SOCIETY

Education   Society  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate CHANDRAKANT KOBNAK

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIRevision Petition No. RP/12/79(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/09/2012 in Case No. 421/2011 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. SUMAN EDUCATION SOCIETYL N COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY SUMAN EDUCATI...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 11-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Education in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Education ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Education under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.