Court Name: Banas Kantha
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. GOSWAMI ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. VIKAS MEHTA & MR. AMJID MAQBOOL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3382 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 17/06/2013 in Appeal No. 872/2010 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR OF ONGC LTD. & 2 ORS.JIVAN PRABHAT TOWER,11TH FLOOR, 124 CANNOUG...
Case Number: 3383
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. GOSWAMI ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. VIKAS MEHTA & MR. AMJID MAQBOOL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3382 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 17/06/2013 in Appeal No. 872/2010 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR OF ONGC LTD. & 2 ORS.JIVAN PRABHAT TOWER,11TH FLOOR, 124 CANNOUG...
Case Number: 3384
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. GOSWAMI ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. VIKAS MEHTA & MR. AMJID MAQBOOL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3382 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 17/06/2013 in Appeal No. 872/2010 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR OF ONGC LTD. & 2 ORS.JIVAN PRABHAT TOWER,11TH FLOOR, 124 CANNOUG...
Case Number: 3385
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. GOSWAMI ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. VIKAS MEHTA & MR. AMJID MAQBOOL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3382 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 17/06/2013 in Appeal No. 872/2010 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR OF ONGC LTD. & 2 ORS.JIVAN PRABHAT TOWER,11TH FLOOR, 124 CANNOUG...
Case Number: 3386
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. GOSWAMI ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. VIKAS MEHTA & MR. AMJID MAQBOOL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3382 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 17/06/2013 in Appeal No. 872/2010 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR OF ONGC LTD. & 2 ORS.JIVAN PRABHAT TOWER,11TH FLOOR, 124 CANNOUG...
Case Number: 3387
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. GOSWAMI ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. VIKAS MEHTA & MR. AMJID MAQBOOL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3382 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 17/06/2013 in Appeal No. 872/2010 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR OF ONGC LTD. & 2 ORS.JIVAN PRABHAT TOWER,11TH FLOOR, 124 CANNOUG...
Case Number: 3388
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. GOSWAMI ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate M/S. VIKAS MEHTA & MR. AMJID MAQBOOL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3382 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 17/06/2013 in Appeal No. 872/2010 of the State Commission Gujarat)1. CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR OF ONGC LTD. & 2 ORS.JIVAN PRABHAT TOWER,11TH FLOOR, 124 CANNOUG...
Case Number: 3389
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2014
Court Name: Central Mumbai
Appelant Advocate Kiran Patil
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CENTRAL MUMBAI DISTRICT.Puravatha Bhavan, 2nd floor, Gen. Nagesh Marg, Nr. Mahatma Gandhi Hospital, Parel, Mumbai-12.Complaint Case No. CC/11/1581. Ajay Narendra Arondekar2/345, Krishnanagar, Dr, Babasaheb Ambedkar Road, Parei Mumbai 400012........
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 04-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Central Mumbai
Appelant Advocate Adv.Kiran Patil
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CENTRAL MUMBAI DISTRICT.Puravatha Bhavan, 2nd floor, Gen. Nagesh Marg, Nr. Mahatma Gandhi Hospital, Parel, Mumbai-12.Complaint Case No. CC/11/1591. Shri Sagar Mohan Zingade4?38, 2nd Floor, MGM Hospital Staff Quarters, Dr. S.S.Rao Raod, Parel, Mu...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 04-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Education in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Education ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Education under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.