Education
Latest Judgments
Total 2441 Consumer Court Cases Against Education.
POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH & ANR. V/S JASWINDER KUMAR, THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MOHAN LAL SINGH, MR. NITESH SINGHI & MS. PRIYA SINGHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 737 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 27/08/2013 in Complaint No. 16/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. JASWINDER KUMAR, THROUGH LEGAL HEIRSS/O. SH. OM PARKASH VERMA R/O. AT. NO. 4, SARABHA NAGAR, SIR...
Case Number: 737
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2017
CADD Center, Institute of Designing and Education V/S Jasjit Kaur
Court Name: Mandi
Appelant Advocate Sh. Neeraj Kumar Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2017
Gagan Singh Rajawat S/O Late Shri Hem Singh Rajawat V/S Regional Collage For Education Reasearch & Technology through Chairman/Managing Director
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kailesh Sharma
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1FIRST APPEAL NO: 1088 /2016Regional College for Education Research & Technology, ISI 17, RIICO Industrial Area, Sitapura, Jaipur.Vs.Gagan Singh Rajawat r/o D 26 Prem Nagar, Jhotrawa, Jaipur & ors...
Case Number: 1088
|
Date of Filing: 31-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-01-2017
CMD, PUNJAB AND SINDH BANK & ANR. V/S AMAR EDUCATION SOCIETY
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.L. GUPTA, MR. B.P. SINGH, MR. R.K. GUPTA & MR. KULDEEP SINGH TOMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 34 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 30/11/2016 in Appeal No. 1279/2014 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. AMAR EDUCATION SOCIETYTHROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN BRIGADIER(RETD.) SH. M.L. BHANDARI 473 SEC. 37,...
Case Number: 34
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2017
Chairman Shivalik College of Education V/S Amandeep Kaur
Court Name: Gurdaspur
Appelant Advocate Sh.Pardeep Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Aseem Mahajan, Adv.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, GURDASPURDISTRICT COURTS, JAIL ROAD, GURDASPURPHONE NO. 01874-245345Complaint Case No. CC/349/20161. Amandeep KaurD/o Hony Malkit singh R/o vill Ghot Pokar Teh and distt Gurdaspur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Chairman Shivalik Colle...
Case Number: 349
|
Date of Filing: 20-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2017
CONSUMER EDUCATION & RESEARCH SOCIETY V/S THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD
The New India Assurance Education New India Assurance Society
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate H.G MAJMUDAR
Respondant Advocate RAJEEV MEHTA
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 19-01-2017
THE ADVANCE EDUCATION TRUST V/S SAGIR HANZELA REHMAN JADA
Court Name: Panch Mahals
Appelant Advocate SELF
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2017
SIDHI VINAYAK EDUCATION V/S KESHAV PRASAD PANDEY
Court Name: Bilaspur
Appelant Advocate SHRI B.K. PANDEY
Respondant Advocate SHRI D.R. SOMAWAR
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2017
(1) C.K. Education (2) Chandrakant Sharma (Director) Industrial House, Shanti Bhawan, Dhanbad -82600 V/S Man Mohan Mehta S/O Late Bhagwat Prasad Mehta R/O.- Manikpur, Post:- Bawadpur, P.S.- Suryagarha, Distt- Lakhisarai (Bihar)
Court Name: Dhanbad
Appelant Advocate (1) Sunil Kumar Thakar (2) Manjeet Kr. Sinha
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2020
IDP Education India Limited V/S Gaganpreet Singh
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri Ritesh Jindal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR Complaint no. 639 Instituted on: 02.11.2016 Decided on: 02.01.2017Gaganpreet Singh Bedi son of Taranjeet Singh resident of Ward No.5, Khai Basti, Lehragaga, District Sangrur. ...
Case Number: 639
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Education in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Education ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Education under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.