company-name-logo

Education

Latest Judgments

Total 2441 Consumer Court Cases Against Education.

Chhattisgarh

Ghanshyam Kumar Sahu V/S Director Open & Distance Education

Education  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Shri S.K.Singh

Respondant Advocate Shri Jitendra Sahu

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 10-05-2018

|

Date of Upload: 17-07-2018

Chhattisgarh

Sukrit Jha V/S Director Open & Distance Education

Education  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Shri S.K.Singh

Respondant Advocate Shri Jitendra Sahu

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 10-05-2018

|

Date of Upload: 17-07-2018

Chhattisgarh

Manager Mats University Open & Distance Education V/S Sukrit Jha

University   Education  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Shri Jitendra Sahu

Respondant Advocate Shri S.K.Singh

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 15-05-2018

|

Date of Upload: 17-07-2018

Chhattisgarh

Miss Savita Sahu V/S Director Open & Distance Education

Education  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Shri S.K.Singh

Respondant Advocate Shri Jitendra Sahu

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 10-05-2018

|

Date of Upload: 17-07-2018

Chhattisgarh

Smt.Kiran Yadav V/S Director Open & Distance Education

Education  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Shri S.K.Singh

Respondant Advocate Shri Jitendra Sahu

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 10-05-2018

|

Date of Upload: 17-07-2018

Andhra Pradesh

1. The Principal, Wishwas Education Society, RAINBOW CBSE SCHOOL V/S Y.S.Tharakeswara Guptha son of Sunder Rao

Education   School  

Court Name: Nellore

Appelant Advocate G.Stalin Babu

Respondant Advocate V.Ranga Rao

Case Number: 59

|

Date of Filing: 04-06-2018

|

Date of Upload: 18-07-2018

Chandigarh

Director, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research V/S Darshan Lal

Medical   Institute   Education  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Prem Chand Dhiman, Authorised Person

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:25 of 2018Date of Institution:27.02.2018Date of Decision:11.07.2018Darshan Lal husband of Late Smt. Asha Surjan, resident of House No.16, Type-V, Power Colony, Roopnagar (Pb.)……Appellant/Complai...

Case Number: 25

|

Date of Filing: 27-02-2018

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2018

Uttar Pradesh

Vitt Awm Lekhadhikari Basic Education Vibhag V/S Shri Krishna Ram

Education  

Court Name: Ballia

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 249

|

Date of Filing: 16-10-2014

|

Date of Upload: 24-06-2022

Orissa

The Public Information Officer, O/o the District Education Officer , Bolangir V/S Dolamani Pradhan

Education  

Court Name: Balangir

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM. BOLANGIRODISHAComplaint Case No. CC/36/2018( Date of Filing : 03 Jul 2018 )1. Dolamani Pradhan At:- Rugudipada, Po/Ps:- BolangirBolangirOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Public Information Officer, O/o the District Education O...

Case Number: 36

|

Date of Filing: 03-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 23-04-2020

Maharashtra

Shri. Shivneri Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit., V/S Sarojini Education & Cultural Foundation through Managing Trustee Xavier Motiram Farnandis

Education  

Court Name: Kolhapur

Appelant Advocate S.F.D'cruz

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KOLHAPURCentral Administrative Building, Second Floor, South Side, Kasaba Bawada Road, Kolhapur.Phone No. (0231) 2651327, Fax No. (0231) 2651327.Complaint Case No. CC/13/369( Date of Filing : 23 Dec 2013 )1. Sarojini Education & Cultura...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 23-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 17-07-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Education in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Education ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Education under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.