Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 110 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 11/11/2014 in Appeal No. 983/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DLF HOME DEVELOPERS LTD.9TH FLOOR, DLF CENTER, SANSAD MARG, NEW DELHI-110001............Petitioner...
Case Number: 110
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ROHIT JAIN & MR. KAPIL MITRA
Respondant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2105 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 11/11/2014 in Appeal No. 947/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SATISH SHARMAS/O LATE SH.J.C. SHARMA, R/O C-2/2499, VASANT KUNJ,NEW DELHI-110070...........Petiti...
Case Number: 2105
|
Date of Filing: 13-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2018
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 884 OF 2017Sahil Sharma Vs LeEco/LeTV & anr. BEFORE: RATTAN SINGH THAKUR, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: None for Complainant.Dated : 5th April 2018ORDER...
Case Number: 884
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Subash Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 520
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-04-2018
Dlf Pramerica Life Insurance Life Insurance Life Insurance Insurance
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHUBHAM BHALLA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2724 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 09/05/2017 in Appeal No. 125/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. M.L. AHUJAR/O HOUSE NO-357, SECTOR-12-APANCHKULAHARYANA...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. M/S....
Case Number: 2724
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
This application has been filed by the applicants/Opposite Parties for depositing an amount of Rs.9,53,593/- by way of demand draft bearing No.515075 dated 21.03.2018, with this Commission, in terms of order dated 19.01.2018 passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redres...
Case Number: 179
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jagjeet Beniwal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:521 of 2017Date of Institution:07.07.2017Date of Decision:22.03.2018Yashbir Singh son of Shri Rajpal Singh resident of House No.1150, Sector 9, Karnal, District Karnal.…….Complainant.Ver...
Case Number: 521
|
Date of Filing: 05-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Harish Nain Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:576 of 2017Date of Institution:26.07.2017Date of Decision:22.03.2018Col. Satya Vrat Sheoran son of Late Major Bharat Singh Sheoran resident of 424 Defence Colony, Hisar.…….Complainant.Ve...
Case Number: 576
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate GAURAV G.S.CHAUHAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 1104 of 2016Date of Institution: 18.11.2016Date of Decision: 21.03.20181. M/s DLF Homes, DLF Valley Panchkula, through its MD, SCO No.190-192, Sector 8-C, Chandigarh.2. M/s DLF Limited, DLF Shopping...
Case Number: 1104
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Bhupander Ghanghas, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Counsel for the decree holder that in terms of order passed by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in appeal bearing No.2539 of 2017, let he be allowed to withdraw this execution application, at this stage, with liberty to fi...
Case Number: 77
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 03-04-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.