Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhishek S Bhaskar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it again, if need be, after giving better particulars/facts. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for th...
Case Number: 83
|
Date of Filing: 23-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate M/S. MAHAJAN & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 712 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 03/03/2016 in Complaint No. 774/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE, CHANDIGARH 2. DLF HOMES PAN...
Case Number: 712
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
It is stated at the bar by Counsel for the judgment debtors that vide order dated 13.04.2018, the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal No.1752 of 2017 has set aside the order passed by this Commission in Complaint No.205 of 2017, ...
Case Number: 97
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 01-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SURENDER PAL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Complaint No. 94 of 2016 Date of Institution: 11.04.2016 Date of Decision: 24.04.2018Surender Sindhu son of Shri Kitab Singh, resident of House No.1173, Sector-11, Panchkula, Haryana.…..ComplainantVERSUS...
Case Number: 94
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:804 of 2017Date of Institution:21.11.2017Date of Decision:23.04.2018Juhi Puthur W/o Sh. Prem Kumar Puthur R/o 9 Colburn Road, East Burnswick, NJ – 08816, United States presently residing at H.No...
Case Number: 804
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:718 of 2017Date of Institution:29.09.2017Date of Decision:23.04.2018Surender Singh Rathee S/o Sh. Dharmvir Singh R/o Flat No.40-C, Army Flats, Sector-4, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula.……....
Case Number: 718
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:802 of 2017Date of Institution:21.11.2017Date of Decision:23.04.2018Deepak Katoch S/o Late Sh. Prakash Chand Katoch,Prasanta Katoch W/o Sh. Deepak Katoch,Both R/o Sharanam-11 Apartments, Nearby SHALBY...
Case Number: 802
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jagjeet Beniwal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:595 of 2017Date of Institution:08.08.2017Date of Decision:23.04.2018Mrs. Sunita Dhull wife of Jagat Singh Dhull resident of House No.85 Park Colony Bhiwani, District Bhiwani, Haryana.Jagat Singh Dhull...
Case Number: 595
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sunidh Kashyap, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:848 of 2017Date of Institution:19.12.2017Date of Decision:23.04.2018Sh. Ashok Sharma aged 58 years son of Sh. R. L. Sharma,Smt. Rajni Sharma wife of Sh. Ashok Kumar Sharma,Both residents of House No.G...
Case Number: 848
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER On the last date of hearing i.e. 16.04.2018, following order was passed by this Commission:- “The decree holders will visit the site today itself and inspect the flat, in question, in the presence of the judgment debtors. Sh.Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgmen...
Case Number: 411
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-04-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.