
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
This application has been filed under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to inflict punishment upon the judgment debtors in not complying with the order dated 23.03.2017 passed by this Commission. It is on record that vide the said order, in a complaint filed by the ...
Case Number: 325
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jagjeet Beniwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the Judgment Debtor states that one defect remains to be rectified and the same shall be removed within 3 days from today. On his assurance, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application at this stage. Ordered accor...
Case Number: 449
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2018
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. O.P. Chugh
Respondant Advocate Sh. Gulshan Chawla
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/15/540( Date of Filing : 27 Nov 2015 )1. Smt. SunitaSmt. Sunita w/o Late Sh. Phool Singh R/o H.no. 409/1 Shastri Marg Gali No. 2 Indira Colony Rohtak. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Pr...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 26-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
This application has been filed under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to inflict punishment upon the judgment debtors in not complying with the order dated 31.03.2017 passed by this Commission. It is on record that vide the said order, in a complaint filed by the ...
Case Number: 210
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
Decree Holder, who is present in Court, very graciously states that he is not insisting upon payment of Rs.2,000/- imposed as cost upon the non-applicants/judgment debtors vide order dated 09.11.2017. We appreciate the gesture shown. This application has been filed under Section ...
Case Number: 301
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
Decree holder No.1, who is present in Court, very graciously states that he is not insisting upon payment of Rs.2,000/- imposed as cost upon the non-applicants/judgment debtors vide order dated 09.11.2017. We appreciate the gesture shown. Ordered accordingly. This application has...
Case Number: 302
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
Decree Holder No.1, who is present in Court, very graciously states that he is not insisting upon payment of Rs.2,000/- imposed as cost upon the non-applicants/judgment debtors vide order dated 09.11.2017. We appreciate the gesture shown. This application has been filed under Sec...
Case Number: 303
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
This application has been filed under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to inflict punishment upon the judgment debtors in not complying with the order dated 20.01.2017 passed by this Commission. It is on record that vide the said order, in a complaint filed by the ...
Case Number: 304
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
This application has been filed under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to inflict punishment upon the judgment debtors in not complying with the order dated 20.01.2017 passed by this Commission. It is on record that vide the said order, in a complaint filed by the ...
Case Number: 409
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
This application has been filed under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to inflict punishment upon the judgment debtors in not complying with the order dated 20.01.2017 passed by this Commission. It is on record that vide the said order, in a complaint filed by the ...
Case Number: 410
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.