Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
In view of order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.12603/2018 titled DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Himanshu Arora & Anr. and further order passed in review applications made, Counsel for the decree holder(s) wi...
Case Number: 107
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
In view of order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.12603/2018 titled DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Himanshu Arora & Anr. and further order passed in review applications made, Counsel for the decree holder(s) wi...
Case Number: 108
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
In view of order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.12603/2018 titled DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Himanshu Arora & Anr. and further order passed in review applications made, Counsel for the decree holder(s) wi...
Case Number: 109
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1489 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 24/10/2016 in Complaint No. 106/2016 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. PRANAB KUMAR BHATTACHARYYAS/O. PRAKASH CHANDRA BHATTACHARYYA, FLAT 2D, TOWER-II, KRISHNACHURA, ...
Case Number: 1489
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NAVEEN SHEOKAND & MS. KRITEKA SHEOKAND
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 381 OF 2017 IN RP/789/20171. MANOJ KUNDU...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA,PRESIDI...
Case Number: 381
|
Date of Filing: 18-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. R. BALASUBRAMANIAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 174 OF 2018 IN FA/440/20171. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. AIR VICE MARSHAL (RETD) CHARANJIT SINGH GILL & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. D...
Case Number: 174
|
Date of Filing: 21-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 10-07-2018
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 346
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:202 of 2018Date of Institution:07.05.2018Date of Decision:28.06.2018Dinesh Singh S/o Maj. Gen. (Retd.) Sukhdev Singh.Ms. Anu Singh W/o Sh. Dinesh SinghBoth residents of House No.1007, Sector 36C, Chan...
Case Number: 202
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:161 of 2018Date of Institution:16.04.2018Date of Decision:28.06.2018Maj. Gen. (Retd.) M. P. Singh S/o Late Shri Jang Bahadur Singh R/o House No.240A, Sector 2, Panchkula 134112.Ms. Smriti Kanwar D/o M...
Case Number: 161
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:203 of 2018Date of Institution:07.05.2018Date of Decision:28.06.2018Gurvinder Singh Bajwa S/o Jagat SinghManjit Kaur Bajwa W/o Gurvinder Singh BajwaBoth residents of #DVF-A1/18-GF#217, DLF Valley Panc...
Case Number: 203
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-07-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.