Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER REDRESSAL FORUM-III (WEST)C-BLOCK, COMMUNITY CENTRE,PANKHA ROAD, JANAK PURI, NEW DELHIComplaint Case No. CC/17/708( Date of Filing : 06 Dec 2017 )1. GULSHAN GABAGH 13/882,PASCHIM VIHAR,DELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF ESTATE PVT LTD.DLF CENTRE,SANSAD M...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 06-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhineet Taneja Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER It is stated that issue remains only qua removing of seepage, which exists on the front wall of the unit allotted to the decree holders. Counsel for the judgment debtors states that the said defect will be removed within three weeks from today and report will be placed on...
Case Number: 102
|
Date of Filing: 23-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 06-08-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors has been filed today, which is taken on record. As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, the persons concerned were not found present at the given addresses. However, Sh Rakesh Kerwell, Direct...
Case Number: 236
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2018
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case No.CC- 192/2018 Dated: 31/07/2018Present:- Sh. Rakesh Kumar Shukla, Husband of the complainant.It is stated on behalf of complainant that he wants to withdraw the present complaint on the ground of territorial jurisdiction with liber...
Case Number: 192
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/118/2018( Date of Filing : 02 Apr 2018 )InComplaint Case No. CC/525/20161. Tarana NegiChandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. & anr.Chandigarh...........Responden...
Case Number: 118
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
ORDER In response to earlier order dated 12.07.2018 passed by this Commission, Counsel for the decree holder(s) states that the decree holder(s) have received information from the judgment debtor(s), to the effect that possession of the unit, in question, is ready to be delivered...
Case Number: 151
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, 4 to 5 small defects are discussed. Sh.Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors, on getting assurance from Sh.Vineet Talwar, assures the Court that those snags will be removed within a short time, may be within 5 to 7 days. It was also stated ...
Case Number: 177
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parminder Kumar, In Person
Respondant Advocate
Today, honorarium of Rs.25,000/- has been paid by Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors to Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Advocate, who was appointed as Local Commissioner vide order dated 17.07.2018. In terms of order passed by us on 17.07.2018, Sh.Ramnik Gupta, Advocate vis...
Case Number: 162
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER At the time of hearing, Sh.Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors states that there is no termite problem with the main door, as alleged by the Counsel for the decree holders. He further states that as a goodwill gesture, he will sent a technical person and i...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 23-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER At the time of arguments, it is apprehended by Counsel for the decree holder that when raising the construction, the judgment debtors have committed many violations of law. If detected, those violations may cause loss to him. Be that as it may, at this stage, we cannot gi...
Case Number: 211
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 23-07-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.