
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application, at this stage, is disposed of by directing the decree holders to send a representation to the judgment debtors stating that they are ready to get the sale deed of the unit, in question, executed. The judgment debtors are directed to intimate to ...
Case Number: 160
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 25-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER It is stated by Sh. Arjun Sharma, Advocate, Counsel for the judgment debtors assisted by Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) that in response to order passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in FA/298/2017 on 23.08.2017 and further orde...
Case Number: 40
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 25-05-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1250 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 21/04/2017 in Complaint No. 952/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD. & ANR.SCO NO. 190-191-192. SECTOR 8-C,CHANDIGARHCHANDIGARH2. DLF...
Case Number: 1250
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1309 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 05/05/2017 in Complaint No. 8/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.SCO NO.190-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH...........Appellant(s)Ve...
Case Number: 1309
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Malik, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:42 of 2018Date of Institution:25.01.2018Date of Decision:17.05.20181. Navneet s/o Ram Niranjan,2. Anita Rani w/o Navneet,Both are resident of 1036, First Floor, Sector 35B, Chandigarh.……...
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 25-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 22-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:712 of 2017Date of Institution:29.09.2017Date of Decision:17.05.2018Anand Mukund w/o Late Sh. M. C. Pandey r/o Someshwari Neelyam, Aira Holmes Estate, Kusumpti, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.…&helli...
Case Number: 712
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Malik Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:781 of 2017Date of Institution:07.11.2017Date of Decision:17.05.2018Suresh Kumar, House No.2, Satff Quarter Jat College Campus Rohtak, (Haryana).…….ComplainantsVersus1. DLF Homes Panchku...
Case Number: 781
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-05-2018
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/18/65( Date of Filing : 01 Feb 2018 )1. ASWATHY NAIRDAYS RESIDENCE VARKEY TOWER JUDGES AVENUE KALOOR KOCHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MOTOROLA MOBILITY INDIA P LTD TOWER D DLF CYBER GREEN CYBER CITY ...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-06-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Manish Jain, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Sh.Tejinder Singh, Advocate that he is working in the office of Sh.Manish Jain, Advocate, Counsel for the complainants. He further states that as per instructions given by the complainants, the matter stands settled and on account of that, he wishes to withdraw th...
Case Number: 290
|
Date of Filing: 05-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Varun Chawla Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the complainant states that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. This fact has been affirmed by Sh.Parveen Jain, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Party. Prayer is to withdraw this complaint accordingly. In view of above, this complaint is dismis...
Case Number: 662
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.