Dlf
Latest Judgments
Total 1989 Consumer Court Cases Against Dlf.
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. ltd. V/S Lt. Col. Akash Sood
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Sachdeva Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
On 21.08.2018, following order was passed by this Commission:- “In Consumer Complaint bearing No.107 of 2016, following order was passed by this Commission on 12.07.2016 :- “At the time of arguments, matter has amicably been settled. On telephonic instructions from Sh...
Case Number: 311
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2018
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., V/S Lt. Col. Bani Singh (Retd.)
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shubhankar Baweja, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is at bar by Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Advocate for the opposite parties, on taking instructions from Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the Company that settlement has been arrived at between the parties and copy of the same has been sent to the complainant. The complainant has shown ...
Case Number: 224
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2018
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., V/S Brigadier Girish Gogia (Retd.)
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:784 of 2017Date of Institution:07.11.2017Date of Decision:28.09.20181. Brigadier Girish Gogia (Retd.) S/o Sh. Chuni Lal Gogia R/o A-405, Meghadri Heights, Yapral, JJ Nagar (Post), Secunderabad –...
Case Number: 784
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2018
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., V/S Deepak Katoch
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors has been filed today, which is taken on record. As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, the persons concerned were not found present at the given addresses. However, Sh Rakesh Kerwell, Direct...
Case Number: 233
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2018
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Sunil Kohar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Kohar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors has been filed today, which is taken on record. As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, the persons concerned were not found present at the given addresses. However, Sh Rakesh Kerwell, Di...
Case Number: 212
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2018
DLF Homes Panchkula Private Limited V/S Dr. Sanjeev Mittal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors has been filed today, which is taken on record. As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, the persons concerned were not found present at the given addresses. However, Sh Rakesh Kerwell, Direct...
Case Number: 238
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2018
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., V/S Col. Ajay Singh Thakur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors has been filed today, which is taken on record. As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, the persons concerned were not found present at the given addresses. However, Sh Rakesh Kerwell, Direct...
Case Number: 235
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2018
DLF Homes Panchkula Private Limited V/S Omvir Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors has been filed today, which is taken on record. As per report submitted by the police officials, as and when raids were conducted, the persons concerned were not found present at the given addresses. However, Sh. Rakesh Kerwell, Direc...
Case Number: 234
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2018
DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT.LTD. V/S RAJESH KUMAR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SANDEEP MALIK
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.183 of 2017Date of the Institution:28.03.2017Date of Decision: 24.09.20181. Rajesh Kumar S/o Sh.Poker Mal R/o H.No.1345, Urban Estate Jind (Haryana).2. Sanjay Kumar Sharma S/o Sh.Poker Mal R/o H.No.13...
Case Number: 183
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2018
M/s DLF India Limited V/S Shakuntla Khatri
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Singh, Shubham Kaushik, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it before the appropriate Fora. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the office record and all the three or...
Case Number: 352
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.