Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhineet Taneja, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER At the time of hearing, it is stated by Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors that in terms of the order passed by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi and by this Commission on 12.11.2018, a demand draft bearing No....
Case Number: 278
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Dharmani, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Sh. Rahul Katoch (Advocate), Special Power of Attorney of the decree holder states that Conveyance Deed has been executed. In view of above, subject to ultimate outcome of pending appeal bearing No.718 of 2017, filed against the order under execution, in Hon’ble National Co...
Case Number: 312
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Hearing: 30.11.2018 Date of decision:10.12.2018Complaint No. 352/2011IN THE MATTER OF:New Era India Consultancy (P) Ltd.E-6, 1st Floor Main Road, KalkajiNew Delhi ….Com...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 11-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anamika Mehra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
The complaint be registered. Admitted. Let notice be issued to the Opposite Parties. Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal), is present in Court to represent the Opposite Parties in some other case. On our asking, he accepts notice of this complaint on behalf of the Opposite Parties. Co...
Case Number: 278
|
Date of Filing: 05-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2018
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate MS.SONIA SAINI
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Execution Application No.:38 of 2018Date of Institution:16.11.2018Date of Decision:26.11.20181. Mrs.Anuradha Gupta W/o Sh.Lalit Gupta2. Lalit Gupta S/o Sh.J.R.Gupta Both R/o # 652, Sector-7, Panchkula. ….Com...
Case Number: 38
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amarbir Dhaliwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
On account of some technical defects in filing this complaint, Counsel for the complainant(s) wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be r...
Case Number: 433
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :22.11.2018Date of Decision : 06.12.2018 FIRST APPEAL NO.497 /2011 In the matter of:DLF Ltd.,(Earlier known as DLF Universal Ltd.)DLF Centre,Sansad Marg,New Delhi-1100...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2018
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI(DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN,I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC.1743/2009 Dated:In the matter of: Nand Kumar Tandon…ComplainantVersusM/s DLF New Gurgaon HomeDevelopers Pvt. Ltd.(Now known as &n...
Case Number: 1743
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate J K Singla & Shivani Singla, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be reta...
Case Number: 326
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2018
Court Name: South Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/368/2009( Date of Filing : 21 Jan 2009 )1. RAM KRISHAN GARGB-11/5 KRISHNA NAGAR, DELHI 110051...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF LIMITED...
Case Number: 368
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 24-11-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.