Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shard Kumar Shukla
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Execution Application No. EA/2/2019( Date of Filing : 07 Jan 2019 )InComplaint Case No. CC/424/20161. Anurag AwasthiS/O Sri Kailash Nath Awasthi R/O 40 Khurshed Bagh...
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2019
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2019
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI(DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN,I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC.1748/2009 Dated:In the matter of: Radhey Shyam Gupta,Preeti GuptaBoth resident of :KP 23, 1st Floor, Pitampura,New Delhi. ..COMPLAINANT...
Case Number: 1748
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 20-02-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADITYA BHARDWAJ
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.63 of 2018Date of the Institution:09.02.2018Date of Decision: 13.02.2019Dr. R.S.Mehla s/o Sh. Late Shri Lajja Ram, R/o H.No. 870, Urban Estate Sector-13, Karnal, Haryana 132001. M No.+91896665870 .&helli...
Case Number: 63
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
When confronted with the question that relief claimed by the complainant is more than Rs.1 crore and, as such, this Commission has no pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain this complaint, Sh.Kunal Thapa, Advocate, proxy for Sh.Himanshu Raj, Advocate, Counsel for the complainant w...
Case Number: 818
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-02-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RANJAN NARAIN
Respondant Advocate SATINDER S GULATI & KAMLDEEP GULATI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3665 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 25/03/2009 in Appeal No. 869/2007 of the State Commission Delhi)1. M/S. DLF UNIVERSAL LTD.DLF Centre. Sandsad Marg. New Delhi -110001...........Petitioner(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 3665
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SATYAWAN AHLAWAT
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.530 of 2017Date of the Institution:01.09.2017Date of Decision: 31.01.2019Sunil Chawla C/o Chawla Trading Company Old Anaj Mandi, Shop No.23, Sirsa, Haryana. .….ComplainantVersus1. DLF Ltd. SCO N...
Case Number: 530
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2019
Court Name: Ahmedabad City
Appelant Advocate R. U. NAHAR
Respondant Advocate K. R. SAKSENA
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 29-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SATYAWAN AHLAWAT
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.435 of 2017Date of the Institution:14.07.2017Date of Decision: 29.01.20191. Sunita Garg w/o Sh. Sh.Anand Garg R/o 1049-A Sector 2 Panchkula Haryana.2. Rajesh K.Goyal s/o Sh. Sh.Sita Ram Goyal R/o 1049-...
Case Number: 435
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Bhuwan Vats Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Service is complete. Sh. Parveen Jain, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents by filing his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the Company is also present in Court. At the time of arguments, the matter has amicably been ...
Case Number: 362
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.427 of 2017Date of the Institution:10.07.2017Date of Decision: 24.01.2019Vijender Singh Malik s/o Sh. Shri Attar Singh Malik and Gautam Malik S/o Sh. Sh. Vijender Singh Malik, both residents of Flat No.C...
Case Number: 427
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.