
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Malik Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER This execution application has been filed by the decree holders under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 to execute an order dated 23.04.2018 passed by this Commission in Consumer Complaint No.346 of 2017. Vide the aforesaid order, following relief was granted...
Case Number: 364
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SH.VIBHUTI SAXENA
Respondant Advocate
O R D E R S H E E T FIRST APPEAL NO. 530/2017RAJEEV GUPTA & ANR VS DLF PRAMERIKA LIFE INSURANCE LTD & ANOTHER.DATE OF ORDERORDER WITH SIGNATUREORDER OF THE REGISTRAR ON OFFICE NOTING13.03.2019 None for the appellants. Dismissed for want of prosecution.(Justice Shantanu S....
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 23-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhineet Taneja Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors filed, which is taken on record. It is on record that despite issuance of directions by the Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi vide order dated 23.08.2017, the judgment debtors failed to make the ...
Case Number: 29
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2019
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V V SURENDRAN
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMC.C. 122/2015 JUDGMENT DATED:21.02.2019PRESENT : HON’BLE JUSTICE S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN : PRESIDENTSMT. BEENAKUMARI.A : MEMBERWilson Kunju.K,S/o Chandapillai Kunju Kunju,Morothu House, Style ...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Radhika Subhash & Jasraj Singh Toor, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Sh. Parveen Jain, Advocate, Counsel for the opposite parties that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. To evidence above said fact, copy of Settlement Deed has been placed on record. In view of settlement arrived at between the parties, this c...
Case Number: 111
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-02-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shard Kumar Shukla
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Execution Application No. EA/2/2019( Date of Filing : 07 Jan 2019 )InComplaint Case No. CC/424/20161. Anurag AwasthiS/O Sri Kailash Nath Awasthi R/O 40 Khurshed Bagh...
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2019
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2019
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI(DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN,I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC.1748/2009 Dated:In the matter of: Radhey Shyam Gupta,Preeti GuptaBoth resident of :KP 23, 1st Floor, Pitampura,New Delhi. ..COMPLAINANT...
Case Number: 1748
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 20-02-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADITYA BHARDWAJ
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.63 of 2018Date of the Institution:09.02.2018Date of Decision: 13.02.2019Dr. R.S.Mehla s/o Sh. Late Shri Lajja Ram, R/o H.No. 870, Urban Estate Sector-13, Karnal, Haryana 132001. M No.+91896665870 .&helli...
Case Number: 63
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
When confronted with the question that relief claimed by the complainant is more than Rs.1 crore and, as such, this Commission has no pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain this complaint, Sh.Kunal Thapa, Advocate, proxy for Sh.Himanshu Raj, Advocate, Counsel for the complainant w...
Case Number: 818
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-02-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RANJAN NARAIN
Respondant Advocate SATINDER S GULATI & KAMLDEEP GULATI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3665 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 25/03/2009 in Appeal No. 869/2007 of the State Commission Delhi)1. M/S. DLF UNIVERSAL LTD.DLF Centre. Sandsad Marg. New Delhi -110001...........Petitioner(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 3665
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.