Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. ANKUR BANSAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1313 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 30/08/2016 in Complaint No. 199/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PRIVATE LIMITEDSCO NO. 190-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH...........Appel...
Case Number: 1313
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-07-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. RAJAT RATHEE
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1740 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 10/11/2016 in Complaint No. 356/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.SCO NO. 190-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH2. DLF HO...
Case Number: 1740
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-07-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. GARVIT KALRA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 239 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 21/12/2016 in Complaint No. 576/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.REGD. OFFICE DLF GATEWAY TOWER, SECOND FLOOR, DLF CITY, GURGAON-1...
Case Number: 239
|
Date of Filing: 07-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-07-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. N. PRABHAKAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 707 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 03/03/2017 in Complaint No. 672/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.SCO NO. 190-191-192, SECTOR-8-C, CHANDIGARH2. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA ...
Case Number: 707
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-07-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. SANJEEV KUMAR VERMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1588 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 13/10/2016 in Complaint No. 337/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE, SCO NO. 190-191-192, SECTO...
Case Number: 1588
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shubham Jain Adv.
Respondant Advocate
To settle the account, Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors has, today in Court, handed over a demand draft bearing No.519685 dated 10.06.2019 for an amount of Rs.12,55,721/- to Sh. Shubham Jain, Advocate, Counsel for the decree holder against receipt. Photocop...
Case Number: 159
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 22-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Puneet Tuli Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Reply and evidence/affidavit not filed by the Opposite Parties. Sh.Puneet Tuli, Advocate, Counsel for the complainant and Sh.Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the Opposite Parties state that the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. On account of which, Coun...
Case Number: 50
|
Date of Filing: 05-03-2019
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Krishan M. Vohra & Satyajeet Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated that an amount of Rs.63,43,959.37 is lying deposited with this Commission whereof 14.09.2016. The office note also confirms the above fact stating that the said amount on making deposit was invested in the Fixed Deposit Receipt and is available for payment. Sh. Satya...
Case Number: 189
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 22-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.S. Sathi & Robin Sathi Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Authority letter/Vakalatnama not filed by the judgment debtors. Against judgment under execution, appeal bearing No.1059 of 2017 filed by the judgment debtors is pending for consideration before the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi. ...
Case Number: 206
|
Date of Filing: 27-06-2019
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajvir Singh Sihag Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated that on 27.05.2019, both the parties agreed that the matter be settled in terms of ratio of judgment in the case of DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. Vs. D.S. Dhanda etc. etc., Civil Appeal Nos.4910-4941 of 2018 decided by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on 10.05.20...
Case Number: 184
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 22-07-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.