Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A.K.BISHNOI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Consumer Complaint No.290 of 2017 Date of the Institution: 09.05.2017 Date of Decision: 24.07.20191. Vijay Gupta son of Gobind Ram,2. Geeta Gupta wife of Vijay Gupta,Both residents of House No.5, M.C. Colony, Main ...
Case Number: 290
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After making requisite calculation in terms of judgment under execution and subsequent orders passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi and Hon’ble Apex Court, Counsel for the parties are in agreement that as on today, an amount of Rs....
Case Number: 208
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After making requisite calculation in terms of judgment under execution and subsequent orders passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi and Hon’ble Apex Court, Counsel for the parties are in agreement that as on today, an amount of Rs....
Case Number: 210
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, Sh. Narender Yadav, Advocate, Counsel for the decree holder(s) and Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors, by looking into the calculations made by each other, agreed that as on today, an amount of Rs.4,50,278/- is due for payment to the...
Case Number: 212
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, Sh. Narender Yadav, Advocate, Counsel for the decree holder(s) and Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors, by looking into the calculations made by each other, agreed that as on today, an amount of Rs.6,58,542/- is due for payment to the...
Case Number: 215
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, Sh. Narender Yadav, Advocate, Counsel for the decree holder(s) and Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors, by looking into the calculations made by each other, agreed that as on today, an amount of Rs.3,75,682/- is due for payment to the...
Case Number: 216
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, Sh. Narender Yadav, Advocate, Counsel for the decree holder(s) and Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors, by looking into the calculations made by each other, agreed that as on today, an amount of Rs.4,10,370/- is due for payment to the...
Case Number: 219
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, Sh. Narender Yadav, Advocate, Counsel for the decree holder(s) and Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors, by looking into the calculations made by each other, agreed that as on today, an amount of Rs.5,74,000/- is due for payment to the...
Case Number: 223
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Hoshiar Chand Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Today, in Court, Sh.Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors has handed over a demand draft bearing No.520084 dated 15.07.2019 in the sum of Rs.12,71,243/- to the Counsel for the decree holders against receipt towards discharge of all the liabilities imposed up...
Case Number: 199
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2019
|
Date of Upload: 23-07-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, the matter has amicably been settled between the parties.2. It is stated that let this matter be disposed of in terms of ratio of judgment in the case of DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. Vs. D.S. Dhanda Etc., Civil Appeal Nos.4910-4941 of 2018 decided by H...
Case Number: 393
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.