Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Today Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors has placed on record a calculation sheet, as per which, an amount of Rs.4,26,503/- remains to be paid by the judgment debtors to the decree holders to satisfy the claim raised in this execution application. Sh. Narende...
Case Number: 211
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 21-09-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Today Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors has placed on record a calculation sheet, as per which, an amount of Rs.3,53,899/- remains to be paid by the judgment debtors to the decree holder to satisfy the claim raised in this execution application. Sh. Narender...
Case Number: 214
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Today Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors has placed on record a calculation sheet, as per which, an amount of Rs.4,80,307/- remains to be paid by the judgment debtors to the decree holder to satisfy the claim raised in this execution application. Sh. Narender...
Case Number: 221
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sunidh Kashyap & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Today in Court, Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors has handed over a demand daft bearing No.52049 dated 26.08.2019 for an amount of Rs.8,11,442/- to Sh. Narender Yadav, Advocate, Counsel for the decree holders against receipt. Photocopy of the said demand dra...
Case Number: 307
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2019
|
Date of Upload: 21-09-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Raj Kamal, Surjeet Bhadu, Abhinav Kansal, Veer Singh & Ashish Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors has undertaken that the judgment debtors will pay the entire decretal amount, which comes to approximately Rs.75 Lakh, within 7 days from today, as per calculation. In view of above undertaking given by Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advis...
Case Number: 289
|
Date of Filing: 05-08-2019
|
Date of Upload: 21-09-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. SIDDHARTH JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1942 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 10/09/2018 in Complaint No. 23/2018 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR/AUTHORISED SIGNATORY/OFFICER IN CHARGE SH. RA...
Case Number: 1942
|
Date of Filing: 29-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 02-09-2019
Court Name: North West
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate MR.RAHUL LAL AKHRIYA & RAJ DEV SINGH
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, NORTH-WEST GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.Complaint Case No. CC/44/2014( Date of Filing : 06 Jan 2014 )1. HIMANSHU KHATTAREW-1/III RD FLOOR MIAYAWALI NAGARDELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. dl...
Case Number: 44
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2019
Court Name: North West
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate MR.RAHUL LAL AKHRIYA & RAJ DEV SINGH
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, NORTH-WEST GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.Complaint Case No. CC/42/2014( Date of Filing : 06 Jan 2014 )1. neena khattarEW-1/III RD FLOOR MIAYAWALI NAGAR DELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. dlf ...
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2019
Court Name: North West
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate MR.RAHUL LAL AKHRIYA
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, NORTH-WEST GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.Complaint Case No. CC/41/2014( Date of Filing : 06 Jan 2014 )1. Neena khattarEW-1/III RD FLOOR,MIAYAWALI NAGAR,DELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. dlf ...
Case Number: 41
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokand & Kriteka Sheokand Adv.
Respondant Advocate
This application has been filed by the applicant/complainants to withdraw an amount of Rs.42,34,619/-, which was deposited by the non-applicants/opposite parties in terms of order dated 03.10.2018 passed by Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi...
Case Number: 431
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.