Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Goyal
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 817
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2019
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Decree holder No.1 has submitted that the decree has been satisfied. However, conveyance deed has not been executed. Both the parties also informed this Commission that the appeal is pending before the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi. In thi...
Case Number: 378
|
Date of Filing: 14-10-2019
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Kumar Adv.
Respondant Advocate
On the previous date i.e.17.10.2019, Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors had filed objections alongwith calculation sheet (Annexure - 3). As per the said calculation, only an amount of Rs.14,05,311/- remains to be paid by the judgment debtors to the decree hol...
Case Number: 349
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2019
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Kumar Adv.
Respondant Advocate
On the previous date i.e.17.10.2019, Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors had filed objections alongwith calculation sheet (Annexure - 3). As per the said calculation, only an amount of Rs.8,64,688/- remains to be paid by the judgment debtors to the decree hold...
Case Number: 351
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2019
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Kumar Adv.
Respondant Advocate
On the previous date i.e.17.10.2019, Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors had filed objections alongwith calculation sheet (Annexure - 3). As per the said calculation, only an amount of Rs.8,44,161/- remains to be paid by the judgment debtors to the decree hold...
Case Number: 350
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2019
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
A/954/2019 This application has been filed by the decree holder seeking exemption from filing certified copies of orders dated 04.08.2017 and 01.08.2019, which is duly supported by an affidavit. In view of reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed and exemp...
Case Number: 425
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2019
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors has filed a calculation sheet, as per which, the balance decretal amount of Rs.9,25,031/- already stood paid to the decree holders on 07.11.2019. The said calculation sheet is taken on record. He has also submitted with afor...
Case Number: 376
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2019
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mukesh Singla Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It has been undertaken by Sh. Mukesh Singla, Advocate, Counsel for the decree holder that all the original documents relating to the unit, in question, shall be returned back to the judgment debtors within a weeks from today. He has also submitted that the entire liability of the...
Case Number: 354
|
Date of Filing: 18-09-2019
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AKARSH GARG
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :20.11.2019Date of Decision : 26.11.2019 COMPLAINT NO.173/2017In the matter of:Ms. Pallavi G. Mohan,E-43, DLF City Phase-I,………ComplainantVersusM/s...
Case Number: 173
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :20.11.2019Date of Decision : 26.11.2019 COMPLAINT NO.609/2016In the matter of:Mr. Shiv Prakash,E-43, DLF City Phase-I,………ComplainantVersusM/s. DL...
Case Number: 609
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.