Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anamika Mehar Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:17 of 2019Date of Institution:18.01.2019Date of Decision:18.12.2019Dharamvir Singh Chopra s/o Banwari Lal R/o Assistant Director, Govt. Murrahbull Station, Hansi Road, Opp Police Line Bhiwani..&hellip...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2019
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Puneet Tuli Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:43 of 2019Date of Institution:25.02.2019Date of Decision:18.12.2019Sh.Mehndi Hasan S/o Sh.Mumtaj Ali, R/o Village Bhiura, Post Office Sakri, Tehsil Khalilabad, District Sant Kabir Nagar, Uttar Pradesh...
Case Number: 43
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2019
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the decree holders and Sh.Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors have submitted that in terms of order dated 07.11.2019 passed by this Commission, an amount of Rs.5 lakhs already released in favour of the decree holders and only interest, which is to be r...
Case Number: 398
|
Date of Filing: 18-10-2019
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2020
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI(DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN,I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC.938/2011 Dated:In the matter of: Shri Naval Sood,S/o Late Sh. Jagraj Sood,R/o 16-E, Kamla Nagar,Delhi-07. .&helli...
Case Number: 938
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jagjeet Beniwal & Ajay Kumar Redhu Adv.
Respondant Advocate
MA/1082/2019 This application has been filed by the decree holder seeking exemption from filing certified copy of order dated 11.07.2019, which is duly supported by her affidavit. In view of reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed and exemption is granted...
Case Number: 442
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2019
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2020
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
The matter has amicably been settled between the parties as out of Court settlement. It has been agreed between the parties that the decree passed by this Commission shall be fully satisfied on payment of amount of Rs.5,50,000/-, in all, by the judgment debtors to the decree hold...
Case Number: 395
|
Date of Filing: 18-10-2019
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2020
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
The matter has amicably been settled between the parties as out of Court settlement. It has been agreed between the parties that the decree passed by this Commission shall be fully satisfied on payment of amount of Rs.5,50,000/-, in all, by the judgment debtors to the decree hold...
Case Number: 397
|
Date of Filing: 18-10-2019
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2020
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
The matter has amicably been settled between the parties as out of Court settlement. It has been agreed between the parties that the decree passed by this Commission shall be fully satisfied on payment of amount of Rs.5,50,000/-, in all, by the judgment debtors to the decree hold...
Case Number: 396
|
Date of Filing: 18-10-2019
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2020
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Krishan M. Vohra Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtor has submitted that the calculation submitted by the decree holders (at Page 73 of the execution file) is correct one. As per the said calculation, an amount of Rs.8,04,329/- remains to be paid by the judgment debtor to the de...
Case Number: 360
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2019
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2020
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Uday Chauhan, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:25 of 2019Date of Institution:05.02.2019Date of Decision:11.12.2019RajeshMohanMehraS/o Late Sh.BrijMohanMehra, R/o H.No.1217, Sec-11,Panchkula,Haryana..……ComplainantV e r s u sDLFHomesPa...
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 05-02-2019
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.