Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RANJAN NARAIN
Respondant Advocate M/S. GAGGAR & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1977 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 11/08/2017 in Complaint No. 584/2015 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. DLF LTD.DLF CENTRE, SANSAD MARG.NEW DELHI-110001...........Appellant(s)Versus1. VINOD KAPUR & ANR....
Case Number: 1979
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2020
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1036 OF 20181. NARENDER GUPTAD-121, FIRST FLOOR, SAKET,NEW DELHI-110017...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF LIMITED & 8 ORS.3RD FLOOR, SHOPPING MALL, ARJUN MARG, DLF CITY PHASE-I,GURGAON2. RAJIV SINGH, MA...
Case Number: 1036
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2020
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJAN NARAIN
Respondant Advocate M/S. GAGGAR & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1977 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 11/08/2017 in Complaint No. 584/2015 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. DLF LTD.DLF CENTRE, SANSAD MARG.NEW DELHI-110001...........Appellant(s)Versus1. VINOD KAPUR & ANR....
Case Number: 1978
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2020
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RANJAN NARAIN
Respondant Advocate M/S. GAGGAR & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1977 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 11/08/2017 in Complaint No. 584/2015 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. DLF LTD.DLF CENTRE, SANSAD MARG.NEW DELHI-110001...........Appellant(s)Versus1. VINOD KAPUR & ANR....
Case Number: 1977
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2020
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate Shri P S Goindi & C M Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2020
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2020
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR KATHPALIA & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1221 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 25/07/2016 in Complaint No. 56/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. PANKAJ GARGS/O. SH. MURLI DHAR KASHYAP, RESIDENTS OF SCF 42, SECTOR-8, PANCHKULAHARYANA .........
Case Number: 1221
|
Date of Filing: 27-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2020
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR KATHPALIA & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1221 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 25/07/2016 in Complaint No. 56/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. PANKAJ GARGS/O. SH. MURLI DHAR KASHYAP, RESIDENTS OF SCF 42, SECTOR-8, PANCHKULAHARYANA .........
Case Number: 1225
|
Date of Filing: 27-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2020
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR KATHPALIA & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1221 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 25/07/2016 in Complaint No. 56/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. PANKAJ GARGS/O. SH. MURLI DHAR KASHYAP, RESIDENTS OF SCF 42, SECTOR-8, PANCHKULAHARYANA .........
Case Number: 1224
|
Date of Filing: 27-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2020
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NAVEEN SHEOKAND & KRITEKA SHEOKAND
Respondant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1221 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 25/07/2016 in Complaint No. 56/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. PANKAJ GARGS/O. SH. MURLI DHAR KASHYAP, RESIDENTS OF SCF 42, SECTOR-8, PANCHKULAHARYANA .........
Case Number: 1499
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2020
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR KATHPALIA & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1221 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 25/07/2016 in Complaint No. 56/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. PANKAJ GARGS/O. SH. MURLI DHAR KASHYAP, RESIDENTS OF SCF 42, SECTOR-8, PANCHKULAHARYANA .........
Case Number: 1267
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2020
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.