Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Raghav Talwar Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHExecution Application No.:344 of 2019Date of Institution:09.09.2019Date of Order:23.03.2021Sunil Sanga S/o Sh. Hari Dutt Sanga,Anju Sanga W/o Sunil Sanga, both residents of B-1/19 GF, DLF Valley, Panchkula, Haryana &nda...
Case Number: 344
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2019
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Raghav Talwar Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHExecution Application No.:313 of 2019Date of Institution:22.08.2019Date of Order:23.03.2021Col. Virendra Mohan S/o Late Sh. Satnam Rai r/o H.No.342, Kautilya Appartment, DDA MIG Flats, Sector 14, Pocket – B, Dwark...
Case Number: 313
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2019
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ASHWANI BHARDWAJ
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Consumer Complaint No.372 of 2017 Date of Institution: 07.06.2017 Date of Decision: 16.03.20211. Hari Om Sharma Attri son of Shri Sita Ram Sharma, District and Sessions Judge, CBI Court, Jaipur.2. Vandana wife of H...
Case Number: 372
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate UJAS KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986Review Application No. RA/6/2021( Date of Filing : 26 Feb 2021 )InComplaint Case No. CC/840/20151. VIPULA AWASTHY & ANR.R/O N-27,G/F KALKAJI, NEW DELHI...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DLF ...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2021
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2021
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate Sh Aditya Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate Sh JK Dang
Case Number: 506
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PRABHU VIJAYAKUMAR
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONTHIRUVANANTHAPURAMComplaint Case No. CC/16/106( Date of Filing : 23 Sep 2016 )1. ROMY CHACKOADVOCATE 199 SAMACHAR APARTMENTS MAYUR VIHAR PHASE 1 DELHI 110091...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MANAGING DIRECTOR DLF SOUTHERN TOWNS Pvt LTD1...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2021
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Date-10/02/2021 CC- 139/2020Case is taken through Video Conferencing.Present:-Adv. Sh. Jai Gupta, counsel for Complainant.During the course of the admission it is transpired that the case pertains to Parliament Street, New Delhi 110001, branch of the OP, hence, the same doe...
Case Number: 139
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2020
|
Date of Upload: 10-02-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:22 of 2020Date of Institution:15.01.2020Date of Decision:18.01.2021Satish Goyal S/o Sh.Yudhister ParshadViney Goyal S/o Sh.Yudhister ParshadBoth R/o H.No.707, Sector 6, HUDA Panipat, Haryana.…&...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2020
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986Complaint Case No. CC/840/2015( Date of Filing : 14 Sep 2015 )1. VIPULA AWASTHY & ANR.R/O FLAT No.605, SWARN JAYANTI GHS, PLOT No.97, SEC-54, GURGAON.2. AKSHAY AWASTHYR/O FLAT No.605, SWA...
Case Number: 840
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Gupta Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHExecution Application No.:5 of 2020Date of Institution:09.01.2021Date of Decision:14.01.2021Brig. Subhash Chander Panwar, SM S/o Sh. Ram Chander Panwar, Deputy General Officer Commanding, P-284, Station House, Bharuwala...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 09-01-2020
|
Date of Upload: 14-01-2021
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.