Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia Adv.
Respondant Advocate Kunal Dawar Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint:69 of 2016Date of Institution:25.02.2016Date of Decision:25.07.2016Sh. Arjun Singh Patial s/o Sh. Bishan Dass,Bishan Dass S/o Sh. Munshi Ram,Both residents of H.No.354-A, Sector 15, Panchkula.&hellip...
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia Adv.
Respondant Advocate Kunal Dawar Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint:70 of 2016Date of Institution:25.02.2016Date of Decision:25.07.2016Sh. Pramod Kumar Kashyap s/o Sh. Murli Dhar Kashyap,Abhishek Kashyup S/o Sh. Parmod Kumar Kashyup, Both residents of H.Bo.214, Secto...
Case Number: 70
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint:71 of 2016Date of Institution:25.02.2016Date of Decision:25.07.2016Lt. Col. Naveen Suri resident of H.No.162/4, Arun Khetrapal Enclave, Allenby Lines, Ambala Cantt., Haryana 133001.…..Complain...
Case Number: 71
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia Adv.
Respondant Advocate Kunal Dawar Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint:72 of 2016Date of Institution:25.02.2016Date of Decision:25.07.2016Abhay Dhall S/o Sh. Shil Kumar,Neha Kapoor W/o Sh. Abhay Dhall,Both residents of H.No.637, First Floor, Sector 10, Panchkula, Haryan...
Case Number: 72
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2016
Court Name: Ahmedabad City
Appelant Advocate V. M. PANCHOLI
Respondant Advocate K. R. SAKSENA
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 30-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Satyawan Ahlawat, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Harsh Nagra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:134 of 2016Date of Institution:07.04.2016Date of Decision:19.07.20161. Punita Sehgal w/o Ashwani Kumar Sehgal R/o 24/7, Ground Floor, Main Road, Shakti Nagar, Delhi – 110007.2. Ashwani Kumar Seh...
Case Number: 134
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Lekh Raj Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
It is stated by Counsel for the Opposite Party that matter has amicably been settled. It has also been so said by the Counsel for the complainant and the complainant, who is present in person. In view of above, this complaint stands disposed of. If settlement is not honoure...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Khunger, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
At the time of arguments, matter has amicably been settled. On telephonic instructions from Sh. Shiv Kumar, Legal Advisor (North), it is stated by Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties that for delayed period, compensation will be paid to the complainants, i...
Case Number: 107
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this compliant with liberty to file the same before the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, as per law. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as wit...
Case Number: 329
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.104 of 2016Date of Institution17.03.2016Date of Decision05.07.2016Dr. Rakesh Raman through his GPA holder Dr. Ranjit Sharma, resident of House No.3127, Sector 22-D, Chandigarh. .&hellip...
Case Number: 104
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.