Dlf
Latest Judgments
Total 1989 Consumer Court Cases Against Dlf.
DLF Universal Ltd. V/S Chand Sodhi
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Ekta Jhanji
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Miscellaneous Application NO. 77 OF 2016in CC/284/2016Chand Sodhi Vs DLF Universal Limited & ors.BEFORE: DR.MANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Parveen Jain, Counse...
Case Number: 77
|
Date of Filing: 31-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2016
DLF UNIVERSAL LTD. V/S JITENDER PAL VERMA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision : 01.09.2016 Date of arguments heard : 17.08.2016Complaint Case No.89/2012Jitender Pal Verma(Through General Power of Attorney Holder)Shri Pushp...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2016
Case Number: 111
|
Date of Filing: 23-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-09-2016
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Sushil Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhishek S Bhaskar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:199 of 2016Date of Institution:11.05.2016Date of Decision:30.08.2016Sushil KumarMrs.Rama Gupta wife of Sushil Kumar, #55, GH-10, Sector 20, Panchkula, Haryana.……ComplainantsV e r s u sD...
Case Number: 199
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2016
M/s DLF Universal Limited V/S Ankur Mujral
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:285 of 2016Date of Institution:23.06.2016Date of Decision:30.08.2016Ankur Mujral son of Kewal Krishan MujralKewal Krishan Mujral son of Sh.Des RajCorrespondence Address:- House No.1013 (FF), Phase-IV,...
Case Number: 285
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2016
M/s. DLF Universal Limited V/S Vinod Goel
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 69 OF 2016in CC/99/2015Vinod Goel Vs M/s DLF Universal Limited BEFORE: DR.MANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Sharad Aggarwal, Counsel for Com...
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2016
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Colonel M.S. Rekhi
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Sh. Harsh Nagra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:232 of 2016Date of Institution:24.05.2016Date of Decision:29.08.2016Colonel M.S. Rekhi son of S.Iqbal Singh Rekhi, aged 51 years.Mrs.Kamal Rekhi, wife of Colonel M.S. Rekhi, aged 46 years.(Earlier res...
Case Number: 232
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2016
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Anil Sharma
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH Complaint case No.:313 of 2016Date of Institution:04.07.2016Date of Decision:29.08.2016Anil Sharma S/o Kewal Krishan Sharma,Kanchan Sharma W/o Anil Sharma,Both resident of G-902, Nilamber Bellisimo, Vasna Bhayli Road, ...
Case Number: 313
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2016
M/s DLF India Limited V/S Sh. Rajbir Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashok Tyagi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/86/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/33/20161. Sh. Rajbir SinghChandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/s DLF India LimitedChandigarh...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh...
Case Number: 86
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
DLF Pramarica Life Insurance Company Ltd. V/S Tara Chand
Dlf Life Insurance Life Insurance
Court Name: Mandi
Appelant Advocate Sh. R.K. Verma
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sameer Kashyap
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.