Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokhand, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of the order be sent to the parties...
Case Number: 589
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: Morena
Appelant Advocate MAHENDRA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:274 of 2016Date of Institution:20.06.2016Date of Decision:12.09.2016Col. B. N. L. Kaushal S/o Late Sh. B. D. Kaushal,Ravi Kaushal S/o Col. B. N. L. Kaushal,Both resident of H.No.485, Sector – 2,...
Case Number: 274
|
Date of Filing: 20-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNIONTERRITORY, CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:275 of 2016Date of Institution:20.06.2016Date of Decision:12.09.2016Sudha Rani W/o Madhu Sudan Syal,Ankit Syal S/o Madhu Sudan Syal,Both residents of Lane No.1, Rose Avenue Saili Road, Path...
Case Number: 275
|
Date of Filing: 20-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Krishan M Vohra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Harsh Nagra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNIONTERRITORY, CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:278 of 2016Date of Institution:21.06.2016Date of Decision:12.09.2016Kanwal Mohan S/o Late Sh. Roshan Lal (Earlier #547, First Floor, Sector – 9, Panchkula), At Present: H.No.1582, Gro...
Case Number: 278
|
Date of Filing: 21-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Harsh Nagra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNIONTERRITORY, CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:282 of 2016Date of Institution:22.06.2016Date of Decision:12.09.2016Nihal Singh S/o Sh. Ami Lal,Ashim Yadav S/o Nihal Singh,Both Resident of H.No.1172, Sector 7, Panchkula, Harayana.&hellip...
Case Number: 282
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNIONTERRITORY, CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:290 of 2016Date of Institution:24.06.2016Date of Decision:12.09.2016Dr. Anil Kumar Gupta S/o Late Dr. Uttam Chand Gupta R/o H.No.1031, Sector -24B, Chandigarh.…..Complainant.VersusDL...
Case Number: 290
|
Date of Filing: 24-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNIONTERRITORY, CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:292 of 2016Date of Institution:24.06.2016Date of Decision:12.09.2016Indu Dadhwal W/o Col. Rajesh Dadhwal, Attending HACC 40, College of Air Warefare, 2, Sardar Patel Road, Secunderabad, Tel...
Case Number: 292
|
Date of Filing: 24-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNIONTERRITORY, CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:300 of 2016Date of Institution:27.06.2016Date of Decision:12.09.2016Capt. Bhupinder Singh Oberoi S/o Late Sharnagat Singh Oberoi;Simaranjit Singh Oberoi S/o Capt. Bhupinder Singh Oberoi;Bot...
Case Number: 300
|
Date of Filing: 27-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNIONTERRITORY, CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:302 of 2016Date of Institution:27.06.2016Date of Decision:12.09.2016Surinder Kumar Singla S/o Sh. Kapur Chand Singla, H.No.90A, Sector 9, Panchkula, Haryana.…..Complainant.VersusDLF ...
Case Number: 302
|
Date of Filing: 27-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.