Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:393 of 2016Date of Institution:25.07.2016Date of Decision:13.10.2016Gautam Kashyap S/o Ashok Kashyap, F-4, Green Park (Main), New Delhi.…..Complainant.VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., SCO 1...
Case Number: 393
|
Date of Filing: 25-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:394 of 2016Date of Institution:25.07.2016Date of Decision:13.10.2016Krishan Lal S/o Sh. Ram Sarup,Sneh Lata W/o Krishan Lal,Both R/o B-XI/735, Gali No.6A, Bharat Nagar, K.C. Road, Barnala, Punjab.&hel...
Case Number: 394
|
Date of Filing: 25-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:395 of 2016Date of Institution:25.07.2016Date of Decision:13.10.2016Nikhil Goel s/o Sh. Tirloki Nath Goel r/o House No.3135, Sector 21-D, Chandigarh.…..Complainant.VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt...
Case Number: 395
|
Date of Filing: 25-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:400 of 2016Date of Institution:26.07.2016Date of Decision:13.10.2016Anoop Chaturvedi son of Late Sh. S. K. Chaturvedi,Jyoti Chaturvedi wife of Sh. Anoop Chaturvedi,Both residents of #1574, ESCIC Socie...
Case Number: 400
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:407 of 2016Date of Institution:27.07.2016Date of Decision:13.10.2016Jasbir Sheokand S/o Sh. Bhal Singh,Samriti Sheokand w/o Jasbir Singh,Both residents of Flat No.401, Salvia Block, Amravati Enclave, ...
Case Number: 407
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Satyaveer Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
When we look into the claim raised in the complaint, we are of the opinion that the amount, in dispute, will be more than Rs.1 crore. In the circumstances, let this complaint be returned to the complainant to file it before the competent Commission. Counsel for the complainan...
Case Number: 666
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 26-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NP Sharma & Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:361 of 2016Date of Institution:18.07.2016Date of Decision:03.10.2016Sh. Tajinder Paul Singh, aged about 54 years, son of Shri Gurjit Singh, resident of House No.3069, First Floor, Sector 21-D, Chandig...
Case Number: 361
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-10-2016
Court Name: Central Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/285/20091. GURPAL KHURANAC-3/11, ASHOK VIHAR, ND...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF 1-E/13, JHANDEWALAN EXTN. ND 55............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. MOHD. ANWAR ALAM PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. VIKRAM KUMAR DABAS MEMBERHON'BLE MRS. MRS. ...
Case Number: 285
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate T J LAKSHMANAN
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMCC.No. 27/16JUDGMENT DATED: 30.09.2016PRESENT : JUSTICE SHRI. P.Q. BARKATHALI : PRESIDENTSHRI.V.V. JOSE : MEMBERP. Ummer Binaf,,Palakkal House, Kattoor P.O,Thrissur District.Working as:Lead Projec...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-10-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.