Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokand, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Complete copy of Independent Floor Buyer’s Agreement dated 22.03.2011 has not been placed on record. In view of that, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly...
Case Number: 710
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Harsh Nagra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:283 of 2016Date of Institution:22.06.2016Date of Decision:20.10.2016Vaibhav Kumar S/o Sh. Vinod Kumar,Uma Devi W/o Sh. Vinod Kumar,Both resident of Block B2, House No.46, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi &nda...
Case Number: 283
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:314 of 2016Date of Institution:04.07.2016Date of Decision:20.10.2016Brig. Jitendra Dixit S/o Sh. Mahabir Dixit, R/o D 11/30 GF, Exclusive Floors, DLF Phase V, Gurgaon. .........Complainant.VersusDLF ...
Case Number: 314
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:364 of 2016Date of Institution:19.07.2016Date of Decision:20.10.2016Asha Gupta, W/o Dr. J. P. Gupta, #34, Near Polytechnic Chowk, Ambala, Haryana.…..Complainant.VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. L...
Case Number: 364
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rohit Mittal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:424 of 2016Date of Institution:04.08.2016Date of Decision:20.10.2016Mrs. Manuj Saini W/o Sh. S. K. Saini R/o #268, Sector 12-A, Panchkula.…..Complainant.VersusM/s DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. ...
Case Number: 424
|
Date of Filing: 04-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NARENDER YADAV, MR. AMARJEET SINGH & MR. ANAND PRAKASH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1231 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 18/08/2016 in Complaint No. 122/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. AMANDEEP KAUR...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DLF UNIVERSAL LTD. & ANR............Respondent(s)...
Case Number: 1231
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Arvinder Sehdev, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.215 of 2016Date of Institution17.05.2016Date of Decision17.10.2016Mrs. Manjit Kaur Brar W/o S. Charanjit Singh Brar, resident of House No.1059, Sector 69, Mohali. .…ComplainantVe...
Case Number: 215
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Tarun Gupta & Dr. Neetu Gupta
Respondant Advocate
The cost of plot purchased by the complainant was Rs.1,78,10,452.51. As per ratio of the judgment passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in the case of AMBRISH KUMAR SHUKLA & 21 ORS. Vs. FERROUS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD., Consumer Case...
Case Number: 686
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikas Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:289 of 2016Date of Institution:23.06.2016Date of Decision:13.10.2016Deepak Narang son of Sh. Nanak Chand Narang R/o House No.501, GH-69, Sector 20, Panchkula (Haryana). .........Complainant.VersusDLF...
Case Number: 289
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:291 of 2016Date of Institution:24.06.2016Date of Decision:13.10.2016Kevti Devi W/o Sh. Sh. Rajpal Singh,Neelam Singh W/o Sh. Karan Singh,Both resident of 1/A24, Naveen Sadan, Near Raju Band Abu Nala, ...
Case Number: 291
|
Date of Filing: 24-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.