Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:439 of 2016Date of Institution:09.08.2016Date of Decision:27.10.2016Ajit Singh Rathee S/o Sh. Rattan Singh, H.No.1281, Sector-3, Rohtak, Haryana.…..Complainant.VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Lt...
Case Number: 439
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:440 of 2016Date of Institution:09.08.2016Date of Decision:27.10.2016Rajesh Kumar Sura S/o Sh. Nand Lal sura R/o H.No.23, Village Gadhwa, P.O. Gaindawas, Tehsil Siwani, District Bhiwani, Haryana.&helli...
Case Number: 440
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajiv Goel, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:447 of 2016Date of Institution:10.08.2016Date of Decision:27.10.2016K. L. kumar S/ Late Sh. Ram Dayal,Gaurav Kumar S/o Sh. K. L. Kumar,Both R/o H.No.803, Sector 8, Panchkula.…..Complainants.Ver...
Case Number: 447
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajiv Goel, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:448 of 2016Date of Institution:10.08.2016Date of Decision:27.10.2016Shashi Kiran W/o Sh. K. L. Kumar,Sharad Kumar S/o Sh. K. L. Kumar,Both R/o H.No.803, Sector 8, Panchkula.…..Complainants.Vers...
Case Number: 448
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S MENON AND PAI
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSALCOMMISSION, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NO.181/2015JUDGMENT DATED 26/10/2016(Appeal filed against the order in C.C No.529/2013 dt. 28/11/2014 on the file of CDRF, Ernakulam)PRESENT:SMT. A. RADHA : MEMBERSHRI. K. CHANDRADAS NADA...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 04-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SATYAWAN AHLAWAT
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. F.A.No.526 of 2016 Date of Institution: 09.06.2016 Date of Decision: 25.10.2016Yudhveer Singh S/o Sh.Karan Singh RedhuSmt. Saroj W/o Sh.Yudhveer SinghAll R/o Flat No.402, Marigold Block, AmrawatiEnclave,Tehsil Ka...
Case Number: 526
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SATYAWAN AHLAWAT
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. F.A.No.556 of 2016 Date of Institution: 17.06.2016 Date of Decision: 25.10.2016Shakuntla Devi W/o Sh.Karan Singh RedhuNarveer Singh S/o Sh.Karan Singh RedhuSmt. Ritu, W/o Sh.Narveer SinghAll R/o Flat No.402, Mari...
Case Number: 556
|
Date of Filing: 17-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikas Sheel Verma,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
As per office report, the complainants had filed rejoinder, in the office, on 18.10.2016. Copy of the same has already been supplied to the Counsel opposite. By indicating towards total value of the plot including Basic Sale Price + EDC (External Development Charges) and othe...
Case Number: 444
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
As per office report, Counsel for the complainants had filed rejoinder, in the office, on 18.10.2016. Copy of the same has already been supplied to the Counsel opposite. By indicating towards total value of the plot including Basic Sale Price + EDC (External Development Charges) ...
Case Number: 481
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Tribhuvan Dahiya, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Sh. Arun Yadav, Advocate appearing as proxy for Sh.Tribhuvan Dahiya, Advocate, Counsel for the complainant that after filing of the complaint, letter offering possession has been received. In view of that, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this compla...
Case Number: 707
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.