Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gorav Kathuria, Diwan Adlakha, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:379 of 2016Date of Institution:02.08.2016Date of Decision:10.11.2016Ram Chander Sharma S/o Sh. Devi Ram Resident of Village Kherimasania, P.O. Uchana Mandir, District Jind, Haryana. .........Complain...
Case Number: 379
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gopal Sharma Adv. & Siddarth Sharma Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:408 of 2016Date of Institution:28.07.2016Date of Decision:10.11.2016Jugwant Singh Malik son of Sh. Attar Singh Malik, resident of H.No.407, Shakti Appartments, Sector-14, Panchkula.Sunita wife of Jugw...
Case Number: 408
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mrigank Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:485 of 2016Date of Institution:19.08.2016Date of Decision:09.11.2016Parvez Chugh son of Sh.Manohar Lal Chugh, resident of House No.18, Model Town, Ferozepur City.…… ComplainantV e r s u ...
Case Number: 485
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill
Respondant Advocate
At the time of hearing, it transpires that total value of the plot, in question, is more than Rs.1 crore. Faced with this situation, Sh. Savinder Singh Gill, Advocate, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint and file it before the competent Fora. He underta...
Case Number: 676
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate KARANJAWALA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. First Appeal No. 904 of 2015 Date of the Institution: 16.10.2015 Date of Decision: 02.11.2016M/s DLF Homes Developer Limited, 1E, Jhandewalan Extension, Near Naaz Cinema Complex, New Delhi-110055.…..Appe...
Case Number: 904
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 07-11-2016
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate PARMOD BHARDWAJ
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Consumer Complaint No:284 of 2016Date of Institution:17.10.2016Date of Decision:02.11.20161. Mukesh Kumar aged 26 years Son of Sh.Ram Phal Singh;2. Ms.Sujeeta Devi, aged 31 years, daughter of Sh.Ramphal Singh;Both R...
Case Number: 284
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate D K Singal & Ammish Goel,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:276 of 2016Date of Institution:20.06.2016Date of Decision:27.10.2016Monika Singla W/o Sh. Amit Singla,Amit Singla S/o Late Shri Bhagwan Dass Singla,Both R/o House No.2, Sector 18, Panchkula.….....
Case Number: 276
|
Date of Filing: 20-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Piyush Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:434 of 2016Date of Institution:09.08.2016Date of Decision:27.10.2016Sh. Amit Mittal S/o Late Sh. V. K. Mittal R/o #1039, Sector-7, Panchkula, Haryana. .........Complainant VersusDLF Homes Panchkula P...
Case Number: 434
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 01-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:436 of 2016Date of Institution:09.08.2016Date of Decision:27.10.2016Kamlesh W/o Dalip Singh, R/o H.No.826, Sector-1, HUDA, Rohtak, Haryana.…..Complainant.VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., SC...
Case Number: 436
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:437 of 2016Date of Institution:09.08.2016Date of Decision:27.10.2016Rajender Singh S/o Sh. Dai Ram R/o H.No.19, Sector 8, Karnal.…..Complainant.VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., SCO 190-191-...
Case Number: 437
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.