Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/507/20161. Col. Virender MohanChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.Chandigarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBE...
Case Number: 507
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:508 of 2016Date of Institution:24.08.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Himanshu Arora S/o Sh. Arvind Kumar Arora,Arvind Kumar Arora S/o Radhey Lal Arora,Both R/o H.No.24, First Floor, Sector – 10, ...
Case Number: 508
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sukaam Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:515 of 2016Date of Institution:29.08.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Col. Baldev Singh Katoch, S/o Sh. Piar Singh Katoch, r/o #22B/D, Green Belt Park, Gandhi Nagar, Jammu currently residing at J.P. Ass...
Case Number: 515
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv,
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:517 of 2016Date of Institution:29.08.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Ramesh Kumar S/o Sh. Baldev Singh,Gautam Sharma S/o Ramesh Kumar,Both Permanent R/o H.No.73/22, Vikas Nagar, Rohtak. .........Compl...
Case Number: 517
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv,
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:518 of 2016Date of Institution:29.08.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Sunil Sanga S/o Sh. Hari Dutt Sanga,Anju Sanga W/o Sunil Sanga,Both Residents of A-703, Kunal Crimson, Ambedkar Chowk, Aundh Road, K...
Case Number: 518
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv,
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:519 of 2016Date of Institution:29.08.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Tarun Bajaj S/o Late Sh. O. P. Bajaj, R/o H. No. 1251, New Light Society, Sector – 51, Chandigarh - 160047. .........Complain...
Case Number: 519
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv,
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:520 of 2016Date of Institution:29.08.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Yogesh Sharma S/o Late Mr. Surender Sharma,Pallavi Sharma W/o Yogesh Sharma,Both R/o Director YS Capital, 306, Buss & Udyog Bhaw...
Case Number: 520
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:521 of 2016Date of Institution:29.08.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Kuldip Saini S/o Sh. Shyam Lal, R/o H. No.503, GH-79, Sector 20, Panchkula. .........Complainant VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd...
Case Number: 521
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:522 of 2016Date of Institution:29.08.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Kumar Prabhakar S/o Sh. Sidheshwar Prasad,Sidheshwar Prasad S/o Late Sh. Pragya Narayan Singh,Both R/o H. No.329, First Floor, Secto...
Case Number: 522
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:523 of 2016Date of Institution:29.08.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Sumit Gupta S/o Sh. Vinod Gupta, R/o H. No. 76, Sector – 4, Panchkula. .........Complainant VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Lt...
Case Number: 523
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.