Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate HARISH BHARDWAJ.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Complaint Case No.:113 of 2016Date of Institution:06.05.2016Date of Decision:08.12.2016Pardeep Kumar son of Shri Ajit Singh, R/o H. No. 748, Sector 17, Urban Estate, Tehsil Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar, State Ha...
Case Number: 113
|
Date of Filing: 06-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:491 of 2016Date of Institution:22.08.2016Date of Decision:06.12.2016Dr. Shruti Aggarwal W/o Dr. Ashish Aggarwal, R/o G-128, GH-2, Shikhar Appartments, Sector-5, MDC, Panchkula.…… Complai...
Case Number: 491
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:492 of 2016Date of Institution:22.08.2016Date of Decision:06.12.2016Kamaldeep Singh S/o Sh. Tarlochan Singh,Loveleen Kamal W/o Kamaldeep Singh,Both R/o Opposite St. Thomas School, Mission Road, Pathan...
Case Number: 492
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:493 of 2016Date of Institution:22.08.2016Date of Decision:06.12.2016Japtej Singh S/o Sh. Kamaldeep Singh,Ashneet W/o Japtej Singh,Both R/o Opposite St. Thomas School, Mission Road, Pathankot, Punjab &...
Case Number: 493
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate TARUN GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No. 339 of 2016 Date of the Institution: 07.11.2016 Date of Decision: 06.12.20161. Surendra Pal Gupta son of Shri Rattan Lal Gupta,2. Madhu Gupta wife of Shri Surendra Pal Gupta,Both residents of Nal...
Case Number: 339
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/438/20161. Chandbir SinghChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.Chandigarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER PAD...
Case Number: 438
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/503/20161. Kavita GoswamiChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.Chandigarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER PAD...
Case Number: 503
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/504/20161. KavitaChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt.Ltd.Chandigarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER PADMA PANDEY...
Case Number: 504
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/505/20161. Col. Amarjit Singh ChandhokeChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes PanchkulaChandigarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER...
Case Number: 505
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/506/20161. Anuj AroraChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.Chandigarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER PADMA P...
Case Number: 506
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.