Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHMiscellaneous Application No. MA/579/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/861/20161. Col Gurbinder Singhut...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.ut...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Sing...
Case Number: 579
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NARENDER VASHISHTA
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI (Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Arguments: 14.12.16 Date of Decision: 19.12.16Complaint No. 1434/16In the matter of:M/s Idea Merchandise Pvt. Ltd.Through its authorised representative/ Director V.N.KayalR/...
Case Number: 1434
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:537 of 2016Date of Institution:02.09.2016Date of Decision:13.12.2016JagmohanMehra S/o Late Sh. PannaLalMehra, R/o H.No.300, Sector – 2, Panchkula..........Complainant VersusDLF Homes Panchkula P...
Case Number: 537
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:538 of 2016Date of Institution:02.09.2016Date of Decision:13.12.2016Dr. R. K. Bansal S/o Late Sh. Gind Singh Bansal,Raj Kumari Bansal W/o Dr. R. K. Bansal,Both R/o H.No.456, Model Town, Phase-I, Bhati...
Case Number: 538
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:539 of 2016Date of Institution:02.09.2016Date of Decision:13.12.2016Priyanka Dutta D/o Col. Sham Saroop Dutta,Maj. Shrutika Dutta D/o Col. Sham Saroop Dutta,Both R/o E-44, Amar Colony, Lajpat Nagar &n...
Case Number: 539
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:540 of 2016Date of Institution:02.09.2016Date of Decision:13.12.2016Manoj Kumar Chhura S/o Sh. Ram MurtiChhura,RituSabharwal W/o Manoj Kumar Chhura,Both R/o B404, The Atlantic No.3, Montieth Road, Egm...
Case Number: 540
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:541 of 2016Date of Institution:02.09.2016Date of Decision:13.12.2016Col. Raj Kumar Sheoran S/o Sh. Jai Lal Singh,Sangeeta Rani W/o Col. Raj Kumar Sheoran,Both R/o Station HQ, Military Station, Sangrur...
Case Number: 541
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Suman Jain Adv. & Shubham Jain Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:573 of 2016Date of Institution:14.09.2016Date of Decision:13.12.2016Mrs. Shelly Garg wife of Shri Ajay Garg, resident of House No.588, Sector 6, Panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panc...
Case Number: 573
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Suman Jain Adv. & Shubham Jain Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/574/20161. Mr. Col Surinder Singh & Othersut...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Private Limited & Othersut ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT D...
Case Number: 574
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav Adv., Vineet Yadav Adv. & Neha Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:577 of 2016Date of Institution:14.09.2016Date of Decision:13.12.2016Wing Commander Vishal Khanna S/o Dr. PranNath Khanna R/o K-20, First Floor, Lajpat Nagar III, New Delhi – 110024..........Comp...
Case Number: 577
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.