Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.P.Dangi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:501 of 2016Date of Institution:23.08.2016Date of Decision:21.12.2016Sunita Dangi D/o Sh. Bhal Singh, Wife of Sh. R.P. Dangi, Resident of H.No.240, Sector-22/A, Chanidgarh. .........Complainants. Vers...
Case Number: 501
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sukaam Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:516 of 2016Date of Institution:29.08.2016Date of Decision:21.12.2016Col. Akshay Mankotia, S/o Sh. K.S. Mankotia, r/o 38/5, Shankar Vihar, Delhi Cantt, New Delhi-110010 currently residing at #497 Int &...
Case Number: 516
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Suman Jain Adv. & Shubham Jain Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:575 of 2016Date of Institution:14.09.2016Date of Decision:21.12.2016Mr. Raj Kumar Garg son of Late Shri Sawan Ram Garg, Resident of Flat No.202, GH-18, MDC, Sector-5, Panchkula.Sanjeev Garg son of Shr...
Case Number: 575
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Suman Jain Adv. & Shubham Jain Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:576of 2016Date of Institution:14.09.2016Date of Decision:21.12.2016Mr. Vijay Kumar son of Late Shri Govind Ram Mehta, resident of H.No.44C-Block, Sirsa, Haryana. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes...
Case Number: 576
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokhand, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:590 of 2016Date of Institution:15.09.2016Date of Decision:21.12.2016Rakesh Kumar Son of Dev Prakash, resident of House No.1062, Sector-2, Panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pv...
Case Number: 590
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:618 of 2016Date of Institution:22.09.2016Date of Decision:21.12.2016Kunal Dawar S/o Brig. Gurdeep Singh.Brig. Gurdeep Singh S/o Kundan Lal Dawar.Both R/o H.No.540, Sector-12, Panchkula. .........Comp...
Case Number: 618
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:619 of 2016Date of Institution:22.09.2016Date of Decision:21.12.2016Krishan Chand Kansal S/o Late Sh. Nohar Chand Kansal.Usha Kansal W/o Sh. Krishan Chand Kansal.Both R/o H.No.143, Sector – 19, ...
Case Number: 619
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:620 of 2016Date of Institution:22.09.2016Date of Decision:21.12.2016Ajay Kumar S/o Sh. Gian Chand, R/o H.No.85/8, Street No.4, Partap Colony, Samana, District – Patiala – 147101. ...........
Case Number: 620
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:621 of 2016Date of Institution:22.09.2016Date of Decision:21.12.2016Anupam Gupta W/o Sh. Vikas Mahajan, 4-Durgesh, Sanjauli, Shimla, H.P.-171006. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. ...
Case Number: 621
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Narender Yadav & Mr. Vineet Yadav
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:622 of 2016Date of Institution:22.09.2016Date of Decision:21.12.2016Sukhwant Raj Singh Randhawa, S/o Sh. Hari Singh Randhawa, R/o 8 – C, Golden Avenue, City Light, Behind Sarjan Society, Surat, ...
Case Number: 622
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.