company-name-logo

Dlf

Latest Judgments

Total 1989 Consumer Court Cases Against Dlf.

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula V/S Surender Deswal

Dlf  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokhand, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:633 of 2016Date of Institution:23.09.2016Date of Decision:03.01.2017Surender Deswal son of Zile Singh Deswal resident of Chamber No.77, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh. .........Complainant...

Case Number: 633

|

Date of Filing: 23-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2017

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula V/S Mohinder Singh Pehal

Dlf  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokhand, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:634 of 2016Date of Institution:23.09.2016Date of Decision:03.01.2017Mohinder Singh Pehal son of Sadhuram Singh Pehal R/o House No.1066, Sector-6, Urban Estate, Karnal (Haryana). .........Complainant...

Case Number: 634

|

Date of Filing: 23-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2017

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula V/S Ranvijay Singh

Dlf  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokhand, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:635 of 2016Date of Institution:23.09.2016Date of Decision:03.01.2017Ranvijay Singh son of Randhir Singh, resident of House No.916, Sector019, Part-II, HUDA, Kaithal (Haryana). .........Complainant. V...

Case Number: 635

|

Date of Filing: 23-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2017

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ajesh Kumar

Dlf  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:655 of 2016Date of Institution:29.09.2016Date of Decision:03.01.2017Ajesh Kumar s/o Sh. P.B. Ahluwalia r/o C-601, Fakhruddin Memorial, CGHS, Plot No.18, Sector – 10, Dwarka, New Delhi.Savita Ahl...

Case Number: 655

|

Date of Filing: 29-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2017

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Nitin Jain

Dlf  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:656 of 2016Date of Institution:30.09.2016Date of Decision:03.01.2017Nitin Jain s/o Sh. Ashok Kumar Jain, r/o 195, Patel Nagar, New Mandi, Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh. .........Complainant. VersusDLF...

Case Number: 656

|

Date of Filing: 30-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2017

Chandigarh

DLF Homs Panchkula Pvt.Ltd. V/S Balbir Singh Dhalta

Dlf  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

After arguing for some time, when facing difficulty in showing that this Commission has pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain this complaint, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it before the proper Fora. Liberty granted. Accordingly, ...

Case Number: 983

|

Date of Filing: 29-12-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2017

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Shri Praveen Arora

Dlf  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ekta Jhanji, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

This application has been filed by the applicants/Opposite Parties for depositing an amount of Rs.50,95,652.04 by way of Demand Draft bearing No.536929 dated 26.12.2016, with this Commission, in terms of order dated 29.09.2016 (Annexure A-2) passed by Hon'ble National Consume...

Case Number: 639

|

Date of Filing: 28-12-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2017

Himachal Pradesh

Manager, DLF Pramerica Life Ins. Co. Ltd. & ors. V/S Partap Singh Thakur

Dlf  

Court Name: Mandi

Appelant Advocate Sh. Harit Sharma

Respondant Advocate Sh. Sameer Kashyap

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 17-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 04-01-2017

Chandigarh

DLF Universal Limited V/S Darshan Malik

Dlf  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:660 of 2016Date of Institution:03.10.2016Date of Decision:28.12.2016Darshan Malik S/o Late Sh. Ram Dayal Malik,Veena Malik W/o Darshan Malik,Both R/o H.No.1185/First Floor, Sector 18-C, Chandigarh-160...

Case Number: 660

|

Date of Filing: 03-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 03-01-2017

Chandigarh

DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., V/S Badri Parshad Gupta

Dlf  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Munish Goel,Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/159/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/337/20161. Badri Parshad Guptachd ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.,chd...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Sing...

Case Number: 159

|

Date of Filing: 08-12-2016

|

Date of Upload: 27-12-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.