Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:699 of 2016Date of Institution:17.10.2016Date of Decision:09.01.2017Monika Balhara D/o Late Sh. I. S. Balhara,Sunil Chaudhary son of Retd. Maj. Bishambar Dayal,Both Residents of #902, Adhunik Apartmen...
Case Number: 699
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:464 of 2016Date of Institution:19.08.2016Date of Decision:03.01.2017Mrs. Gunjan Agarwal, 403, Light Air Defence Regiment, C/0 56 APO – 926403, Uttar Pradesh, India. .........Complainant. Versus...
Case Number: 464
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:465 of 2016Date of Institution:17.08.2016Date of Decision:03.01.2017Prem Singh Verma, House No.267, Shivalik Enclave, NAC, Manimajra, Chandigarh. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. ...
Case Number: 465
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:466 of 2016Date of Institution:17.08.2016Date of Decision:03.01.2017Col. Vikas Gupta, 471/12, Defence Officer’s Enclave, SP Marg Baudham, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi – 110021. (As per complain...
Case Number: 466
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mukand Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:599 of 2016Date of Institution:16.09.2016Date of Decision:03.01.2017N. Khosla son of Late Dewan Ranjan Parshad, House No.180, Sector 6, Panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt....
Case Number: 599
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Malik Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:612 of 2016Date of Institution:23.09.2016Date of Decision:03.01.2017Chander Bhan son of Amir Singh resident of Village Kharenti, District Rohtak, Haryana. .........Complainant. VersusM/s DLF India Li...
Case Number: 612
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kathpalia Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:613 of 2016Date of Institution:21.09.2016Date of Decision:03.01.2017Col. Jarnail Singh, Flat No.403, Block No.E-14, Sandeep Vihar, GH-79, Sector 20, Panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes P...
Case Number: 613
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Suman Jain, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:628 of 2016Date of Institution:23.09.2016Date of Decision:03.01.2017Mrs. Shashi Malhotra wife of Late Mr. Loveleen Malhotra, resident of House No.B1/2, Sector-4, Eldeco Estate Opp. Babarpur Mandir, Pa...
Case Number: 628
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Piyush Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:630 of 2016Date of Institution:23.09.2016Date of Decision:03.01.2017Sh. Akhil Goel s/o Sh. Anil Goel r/o Aggarwal Bhawan, Opposite Bus Stand, Sanjauli, Shimla, H.P., presently residing in House No.39,...
Case Number: 630
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Naveen Sheokhand, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No. CC/631/20161. Santosh RedhuChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF Homes PanchkulaChandigarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Jasbir Singh PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER PADMA PANDEY M...
Case Number: 631
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.