Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate VAIBHAV JAIN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No. 272 of 2016 Date of the Institution: 15.09.2016 Date of Decision: 13.01.2017Dr. Kulmeet Singh Soin aged 57 years son of S. Nirbhai Singh Soin, resident of House No.225-L, Model Town, Ludhiana thr...
Case Number: 272
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arun Agarwal
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1055
|
Date of Filing: 18-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Pavinder Singh Bedi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Ekta Jhanji, adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:553 of 2016Date of Institution:07.09.2016Date of Decision:09.01.2017Smt. Roma Sangwan w/o Sh. Kalyan Singh, Aged 61 years, R/o House No.105, Sector 2, Panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusM/s DLF H...
Case Number: 553
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Pavinder Singh Bedi,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:554 of 2016Date of Institution:07.09.2016Date of Decision:09.01.2017Mr. Kalyan Singh S/o Sh. Ishar Singh, Age 74 years R/o House No.105, Sector 2, Panchkula. .........Complainant. VersusM/s DLF Homes...
Case Number: 554
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:611 of 2016Date of Institution:21.09.2016Date of Decision:09.01.2017Mrs. Harjinder Kaur wife of S. Joginder Singh, aged about 51 years, House No.146, Sector 8-A, Chandigarh. .........Complainant. Ver...
Case Number: 611
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sukaam Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:629 of 2016Date of Institution:23.09.2016Date of Decision:09.01.2017D. R. Kairon S/o Late Sh. Tara Chand, earlier R/o #926, Sector-7-B, Chandigarh currently residing at V.P.O. Deoban, Tehsil & Dis...
Case Number: 629
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:657 of 2016Date of Institution:30.09.2016Date of Decision:09.01.2017Narender Kumar s/o Sh. Jai Singh r/o 200/3, Park road, Gohana, Sonipat, Haryana. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pv...
Case Number: 657
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arjun Sheoran, Neha Sonawane, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:658 of 2016Date of Institution:30.09.2016Date of Decision:09.01.2017Raj Kumar Gupta S/o Late Sh. Faquir Chand,Resident of House No.2623/10, Kumhar Gali, Nahan, District Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh.Navee...
Case Number: 658
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:661 of 2016Date of Institution:03.10.2016Date of Decision:09.01.2017Asha Bhardwaj W/o Col. Ajit Singh Rana,Col. Ajit Singh Rana S/o Sh. Voham Singh Rana,Both R/o #605, Block B, Vikarm Vihar, AWHO Comp...
Case Number: 661
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Malik
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:677 of 2016Date of Institution:05.10.2016Date of Decision:09.01.2017Rishipal son of Sh. Dharam Singh Resident of C/o House No.3548 Block/D, Urban Estate Jind (Haryana), Permanent resident of Village B...
Case Number: 677
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.