Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:764 of 2016Date of Institution:04.11.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Reena Rathee W/o Sh. Surender Singh R/o Flat No.40 C, Army Flats, Sector-4, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula. .........Complainant. Ve...
Case Number: 764
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:765 of 2016Date of Institution:04.11.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Vikrant Sharma S/o Sh. Shiv Darshan Sharma R/o C/o Gurmeet Singh, House No.3124, Sector 71, Mohali. .........Complainant. VersusDLF...
Case Number: 765
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:766 of 2016Date of Institution:04.11.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Bimla Devi W/o Sh. Ramesh Kumar, H.No.948, Sector-2, Rohtak. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., SCO 190-191...
Case Number: 766
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:767 of 2016Date of Institution:04.11.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Lt. Col. Jitender Bhakar S/o Col. Tara Chand Bhakar (Retd.);Kamlesh Bhakar W/o Lt. Col. Jitender Bhakar,Both R/o H.No.531, Sector 13...
Case Number: 767
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jasneet Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:670 of 2016Date of Institution:04.10.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Gaurav Kumar S/o Sh. Brijinder Das Kumar, R/o #2, Adarsh Nagar, Faridkot – 151203, Punjab. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Ho...
Case Number: 670
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jasneet Kaur, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:673 of 2016Date of Institution:04.10.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Gurvinder Singh Bajwa S/o Jagat Singh R/o House No.100, Sector-2, Panchkula, HaryanaManjit Kaur Bajwa W/o Gurvinder Singh Bajwa R/o ...
Case Number: 673
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav & Neha Yadav
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:680 of 2016Date of Institution:13.10.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Manjit Dahiya S/o Sh. Daljit Singh Dahiya, R/o H.No.516, Sector 14, Sonepat. .........Complainant. VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. L...
Case Number: 680
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav & Neha Yadav
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:681 of 2016Date of Institution:13.10.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Brig. Gopal Bhandari S/o Late Sh. K.D. Bhandari,Nishi Bhandari W/o Brig. Gopal Bhandari,Both R/o H.No.687, Sector 28, Noida – ...
Case Number: 681
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav & Neha Yadav
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:682 of 2016Date of Institution:13.10.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Neeru Goel W/o Sh. Sanjay Goel.Sanjay Goel S/o Sh. Sadhu Ram Goel.Both R/o #636, Sector – 7, Panchkula. .........Complainants...
Case Number: 682
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Vineet Yadav & Neha Yadav
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:683 of 2016Date of Institution:13.10.2016Date of Decision:30.01.2017Hemant Kumar Gupta S/o Sh. S.P. Gupta.Anu Gupta S/o Sh. Hemant Kumar Gupta.Both R/o Evergreen House, 1 New Road, Chotta Shimla, Shim...
Case Number: 683
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.